Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jarrett on Gun-Control Push: ‘Everyone Should Be Able to Live in Our Country’
PJ Tatler ^ | 8-27-2015 | Bridget Johnson

Posted on 08/27/2015 10:19:53 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot

White House senior advisor Valerie Jarrett said the administration is renewing its call for gun control because while Wednesday’s journalist murders in Virginia “may not have been a mass shooting… it felt like a mass shooting.”

Killer Vester Flanagan, who murdered reporter Alison Parker and cameraman Adam Ward and wounded Chamber of Commerce official Vicki Gardner, passed a background check to buy two Glock handguns weeks ago.

Jarrett told MSNBC last night that the shooting was “just heartbreaking,” and “we’re just faced with another tragedy.”

“And we are once again asking ourselves, what more can we do? We know that the president took 23 different executive actions to try to make it safer for Americans. We know from our effort after Sandy Hook, that 90 percent of the Americans believe we need sensible gun legislation and we are continuing to call on Congress to act,” she said.

(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; banglist; guncontrol; jarrett; valeriejarrett; vesterleeflanagan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last
To: Sir Napsalot

Well, now all we have to do is figure out where the next attack will occur in about 2 weeks. It is becoming almost predictable.

Does anyone else see a pattern here?


21 posted on 08/27/2015 10:36:05 AM PDT by fishnuts2 (Not rich enough to be a democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Jarrett=phoney hypeocritter. As chief advisor what role has she played in the creation of the “Hands Up Don’t Shoot” victim of police abuse stories which ended up in several cop killings.


22 posted on 08/27/2015 10:36:28 AM PDT by mosesdapoet (Some of my best rebuttals are in FR's along with meaningless venting no one reads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

...says the Iranian-born woman who has enabled Iran to commit nuclear holocaust upon the world. Gun violence will seem microscopic compared to the mass slaughter by Iran she will have enabled.


23 posted on 08/27/2015 10:37:16 AM PDT by CivilWarBrewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

The real solution is to incarcerate black and illegal aliens males, if you are just going by the numbers. Throw in crazy people in general and the murder rate falls like a rock.

But the object isn’t to stop deaths, it is to promote an agenda.


24 posted on 08/27/2015 10:37:45 AM PDT by DaxtonBrown (http://www.futurnamics.com/reid.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot
“the voices of the American people have to be heard in this dialogue.”

You mean like BUILD THE WALL!

25 posted on 08/27/2015 10:38:29 AM PDT by johnny reb (When in the course of human events.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

WHEN WILL BE RID OF THIS REPTILIAN FOREIGNER????


26 posted on 08/27/2015 10:38:42 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Ok. We won't call them 'Anchor Babies'. From now on, we shall call them 'Fetal Grappling Hooks'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hadaclueonce
"Semi Black homo terrible at his job getting fired for a bad attitude ..."

Oh sorry, thought you were talking about soetoro getting impeached.

27 posted on 08/27/2015 10:38:42 AM PDT by Eagles6 ( Valley Forge Redux. If not now, when? If not here, where? If not us then who?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: hadaclueonce
Semi-black homo terrible at his job

O! I thought for a second you meant Obama.

28 posted on 08/27/2015 10:39:50 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Ok. We won't call them 'Anchor Babies'. From now on, we shall call them 'Fetal Grappling Hooks'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

#blackonblacklivesdontmatter


29 posted on 08/27/2015 10:43:27 AM PDT by Vaquero ( Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

“And we are once again asking ourselves, what more can we do?”

No you’re not. The only thing you keep asking yourself is, “Why can’t we just get rid of the 2nd Amendment?” There are dozens of other things you COULD do...none them requiring elimination of or watering down of the 2nd...but that’s not what you want.


30 posted on 08/27/2015 10:43:51 AM PDT by Lee'sGhost ("Just look at the flowers, Lizzie. Just look at the flowers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot
"What more can we do?" (Jarrett)

First of all, "we" (an American President and Administration) might review the standards which some of America's early Presidents considered to be essential and worthy qualifications for the Presidency.

Below are the words of the second President of the U. S., John Adams, a signer of the Constitution, who, in his First Inaugural's closing paragraph, laid out his understanding of the qualifications for the Office of President.

Inaugural Address of President John Adams

- (Excerpted & reformatted final words)

Philadelphia, March 4, 1797

“. . . as something may be expected, the occasion, I hope, will be admitted as an apology if I venture to say that

- if a preference, upon principle, of a free republican government, formed upon long and serious reflection, after a diligent and impartial inquiry after truth;

- if an attachment to the Constitution of the United States, and a conscientious determination to support it until it shall be altered by the judgments and wishes of the people, expressed in the mode prescribed in it;

- if a respectful attention to the constitutions of the individual States and a constant caution and delicacy toward the State governments;

- if an equal and impartial regard to the rights, interest, honor, and happiness of all the States in the Union, without preference or regard to a northern or southern, an eastern or western, position, their various political opinions on unessential points or their personal attachments;

- if a love of virtuous men of all parties and denominations;

- if a love of science and letters and a wish to patronize every rational effort to encourage schools, colleges, universities, academies, and every institution for propagating knowledge, virtue, and religion among all classes of the people, not only for their benign influence on the happiness of life in all its stages and classes, and of society in all its forms, but as the only means of preserving our Constitution from its natural enemies, the spirit of sophistry, the spirit of party, the spirit of intrigue, the profligacy of corruption, and the pestilence of foreign influence, which is the angel of destruction to elective governments;

- if a love of equal laws, of justice, and humanity in the interior administration;

- if an inclination to improve agriculture, commerce, and manufacturers for necessity, convenience, and defense;

- if a spirit of equity and humanity toward the aboriginal nations of America, and a disposition to meliorate their condition by inclining them to be more friendly to us, and our citizens to be more friendly to them;

- if an inflexible determination to maintain peace and inviolable faith with all nations, and that system of neutrality and impartiality among the belligerent powers of Europe which has been adopted by this Government and so solemnly sanctioned by both Houses of Congress and applauded by the legislatures of the States and the public opinion, until it shall be otherwise ordained by Congress;

- if a personal esteem for the French nation, formed in a residence of seven years chiefly among them, and a sincere desire to preserve the friendship which has been so much for the honor and interest of both nations;

- if, while the conscious honor and integrity of the people of America and the internal sentiment of their own power and energies must be preserved, an earnest endeavor to investigate every just cause and remove every colorable pretense of complaint;

- if an intention to pursue by amicable negotiation a reparation for the injuries that have been committed on the commerce of our fellow-citizens by whatever nation, and if success can not be obtained, to lay the facts before the Legislature, that they may consider what further measures the honor and interest of the Government and its constituents demand;

- if a resolution to do justice as far as may depend upon me, at all times and to all nations, and maintain peace, friendship, and benevolence with all the world;

- if an unshaken confidence in the honor, spirit, and resources of the American people, on which I have so often hazarded my all and never been deceived;

- if elevated ideas of the high destinies of this country and of my own duties toward it, founded on a knowledge of the moral principles and intellectual improvements of the people deeply engraven on my mind in early life, and not obscured but exalted by experience and age;

and, with humble reverence, I feel it to be my duty to add, if a veneration for the religion of a people who profess and call themselves Christians, and a fixed resolution to consider a decent respect for Christianity among the best recommendations for the public service, can enable me in any degree to comply with your wishes, it shall be my strenuous endeavor that this sagacious injunction of the two Houses shall not be without effect.

With this great example before me, with the sense and spirit, the  faith and honor, the duty and interest, of the same American people pledged to support the Constitution of the United States, I entertain no doubt of its continuance in all its energy, and my mind is prepared without hesitation to lay myself under the most solemn obligations to support it to the utmost of my power.

And may that Being who is supreme over all, the Patron of Order, the Fountain of Justice, and the Protector in all ages of the world of virtuous liberty, continue His blessing upon this nation and its Government and give it all possible success and duration consistent with the ends of His providence.” - John Adams, First Inaugural

Then, the Author of our Declaration of Independence and President of the U. S., Thomas Jefferson, in his 1801 Inaugural Address laid out what might be considered to be "qualifications" for the American presidency:
(Excerpt, "Our Ageless Constitution," p. xiv, reformatted)
"Let us, then, with courage and confidence pursue our own Federal and Republican principles, our attachment to union and representative government. Kindly separated by nature and a wide ocean from the exterminating havoc of one quarter of the globe; too high-minded to endure the degradations of the others; possessing a chosen country, with room enough for our descendants to the thousandth and thousandth generation;

- entertaining a due sense of our equal right to the use of our own faculties, to the acquisitions of our own industry, to honor and confidence from our fellow-citizens, resulting not from birth, but from our actions and their sense of them;

= enlightened by a benign religion, professed, indeed, and practiced in various forms, yet all of them inculcating honesty, truth, temperance, gratitude, and the love of man;

- acknowledging and adoring an overruling Providence, which by all its dispensations proves that it delights in the happiness of man here and his greater happiness hereafter

—with all these blessings, what more is necessary to make us a happy and a prosperous people?

- Still one thing more, fellow-citizens—a wise and frugal Government, which shall restrain men from injuring one another, shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned.

- This is the sum of good government, and this is necessary to close the circle of our felicities.

"About to enter, fellow-citizens, on the exercise of duties which comprehend everything dear and valuable to you,

- it is proper you should understand what I deem the essential principles of our Government, and consequently those which ought to shape its Administration. I will compress them within the narrowest compass they will bear, stating the general principle, but not all its limitations.

- Equal and exact justice to all men, of whatever state or persuasion, religious or political;

- peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none;

- the support of the State governments in all their rights, as the most competent administrations for our domestic concerns and the surest bulwarks against antirepublican tendencies;

- the preservation of the General Government in its whole constitutional vigor, as the sheet anchor of our peace at home and safety abroad;

- a jealous care of the right of election by the people—a mild and safe corrective of abuses which are lopped by the sword of revolution where peaceable remedies are unprovided;

- absolute acquiescence in the decisions of the majority, the vital principle of republics, from which is no appeal but to force, the vital principle and immediate parent of despotism;

- a well disciplined militia, our best reliance in peace and for the first moments of war, till regulars may relieve them;

- the supremacy of the civil over the military authority;

- economy in the public expense, that labor may be lightly burthened;

- the honest payment of our debts and sacred preservation of the public faith;

- encouragement of agriculture, and of commerce as its handmaid;

- the diffusion of information and arraignment of all abuses at the bar of the public reason;

- freedom of religion; freedom of the press, and freedom of person under the protection of the habeas corpus, and trial by juries impartially selected.

These principles form the bright constellation which has gone before us and guided our steps through an age of revolution and reformation. The wisdom of our sages and blood of our heroes have been devoted to their attainment. They should be the creed of our political faith, the text of civic instruction, the touchstone by which to try the services of those we trust; and should we wander from them in moments of error or of alarm, let us hasten to retrace our steps and to regain the road which alone leads to peace, liberty, and safety."

Further, if Jarrett continues to ask, "What more can we do?" then she and her counterparts in the Administration might consider the words of the man known as "the father of the Constitution" under which they serve:

Excerpt:
Excerpt "Because we hold it for a fundamental and undeniable truth, “that Religion or the duty which we owe to our Creator and the Manner of discharging it, can be directed only by reason and conviction, not by force or violence.”

"The Religion then of every man must be left to the conviction and conscience of every man; and it is the right of every man to exercise it as these may dictate. This right is in its nature an unalienable right. It is unalienable; because the opinions of men, depending only on the evidence contemplated by their own minds, cannot follow the dictates of other men: It is unalienable also; because what is here a right towards men, is a duty towards the Creator. It is the duty of every man to render to the Creator such homage, and such only, as he believes to be acceptable to him. This duty is precedent both in order of time and degree of obligation, to the claims of Civil Society. Before any man can be considered as a member of Civil Society, he must be considered as a subject of the Governor of the Universe: And if a member of Civil Society, who enters into any subordinate Association, must always do it with a reservation of his duty to the general authority; much more must every man who becomes a member of any particular Civil Society, do it with a saving of his allegiance to the Universal Sovereign. We maintain therefore that in matters of Religion, no man’s right is abridged by the institution of Civil Society, and that Religion is wholly exempt from its cognizance." - James Madison

Is there anywhere a clearer statement of the underlying principle of the U. S. Constitution's provisions and protections for "the People's" rights and liberties?

The very foundation of the Founders' Declaration of Independence from a "government-over-people" rule to one of a people's recognition of "overruling Providence" and "people-over-government" liberty was summarized in Jefferson's, "The God who gave us life, gave us liberty at the same time: the hand of force may destroy, but cannot disjoin them."

In our generation, do we not see that "hand of force" unmasked at the same time as that same "hand" not only is reluctant to recognize Madison's "Creator," "the Governor of the Universe," and "Universal Sovereign," or Jefferson's "the God who gave us life," but utilizes that "hand of force" to deny public discourse to include those descriptions in its "politically-correct" discourse or teaching of the youth of America?


31 posted on 08/27/2015 10:44:45 AM PDT by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot
Valerie Jarrett said the administration is renewing its call for gun control because while Wednesday’s journalist murders in Virginia “may not have been a mass shooting… it felt like a mass shooting.”

They have gun control in your native land, go back there.

32 posted on 08/27/2015 10:45:42 AM PDT by verga (I might as well be playng chess with pigeons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Uh, gal pal val. Newsflash. It was a gay black racist so there’s no there, there. Justifiable homicide. They disrespected him and invalidated his beliefs. Or something.


33 posted on 08/27/2015 10:46:01 AM PDT by rktman (Served in the Navy to protect the rights of those that want to deprive me of mine. Kinda weird.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Dennis Prager commented yesterday that, when he had visited the Soviet Union, he felt safe going anywhere in Moscow, day or night. Nobody had guns.....except for the government.


34 posted on 08/27/2015 10:46:24 AM PDT by Southside_Chicago_Republican (If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Jarrett eff off. If you ban guns, I will break the law. I am in charge, not Bacrock.


35 posted on 08/27/2015 10:48:34 AM PDT by Darren McCarty (Cruz in 2016 - No Trump. No Jeb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Go back to Tehran, lizard lady.


36 posted on 08/27/2015 10:53:13 AM PDT by beethovenfan (Islam is a cancer on civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot
what more can we do?for starters turn the clock back to when America had a strong middle class, Christianity was accepted everywhere, even in our schools, the southern border was under control and drugs and organized crime was the enemy that the FBI focused on, there were family values and adults would swat some little jackass kid even when the kid was not his own and the parents backed the adult/teacher. This society has lost it's values and it isn't hard to conclude that as a direct trickle down from the corruption in DC serving the wealthy elite who felt threatened by the strength and independence of the American middle class. My $.02.
37 posted on 08/27/2015 10:55:50 AM PDT by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

I was worried that my knee jerk reaction would be a bit extreme, seems I am on the more tolerant side in this particular discussion.


38 posted on 08/27/2015 11:01:19 AM PDT by verga (I might as well be playng chess with pigeons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Noumenon

I would pay the government to spring the trap.


39 posted on 08/27/2015 11:11:49 AM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: loveliberty2

Excellent post. That jarrett even needs to ask— indicates she is incompetent on the surface and a lying manipulating totalitarian in all reality. Socialism is force. And force cannot be made in the face of the Rigth to Keep and Bear Arms.
The Founders knew this as a last.

The “killings” are the result of a failure of decades of leftist socialist policies and educational bent. pure marxist in scope and delivery— to drive a wedge and destroy our beloved nation.


40 posted on 08/27/2015 11:18:35 AM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson