Posted on 07/24/2015 5:25:44 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Traveling to the Moon just got a whole lot cheaper. A NASA-funded study (PDF) has found that the cost of lunar missions could be reduced by a factor of 10 using a number of techniques – and it could also have implications for getting humans to Mars.
The extensive NexGen Space study by the National Space Society (NSS) and the Space Frontier Foundation (SFF) said that partnerships with private companies could return humans to the Moon for $10 billion (£6.4 billion), rather than the previosuly estimated $100 billion (£64 billion) that had turned off potential suitors. Utilizing fuel sourced from the Moon – namely water and hydrogen – could also drastically reduce the cost of space travel further into the Solar System.
“A factor of ten reduction in cost changes everything,” said NSS Executive Committee Chair Mark Hopkins in a statement.
The goal of the study was to see if public-private partnerships and other approaches could result in a low-cost and low-risk method to return humans to the Moon while supporting future missions to Mars, dubbed an Evolvable Lunar Architecture (ELA).
The study points to NASA’s successful investments in private spaceflight so far through its COTS and CRS programs. By 2017, two manned spacecraft are set to launch as a result of the subsequent Commercial Crew Program – SpaceX’s manned Dragon capsule and Boeing’s CST-100.
Heavy-lift rockets are also in production, notably SpaceX’s Falcon Heavy and United Launch Alliance's (ULA) upcoming Vulcan rocket, that could be used to launch astronauts there without relying on NASA’s costly Space Launch System. Reusable spacecraft and lunar landers could also keep things on the cheaper side.
In five to seven years, the study says the U.S. could return astronauts to the Moon for $10 billion (£6.4 billion) – less than $2 billion (£1.3 billion) a year. In 10 to 12 years, it says that a four-person industrial base on the Moon could be operational, costing $40 billion (£26 billion), less than $4 billion (£2.6 billion) a year.
Both of these proposals could be covered by NASA’s existing deep space human spaceflight budget, which stands at about $4 billion a year.
Crucially, the study says that a manned base on the Moon could produce 200 million tons of spacecraft propellant per year from water and hydrogen on the lunar surface. This propellant could be utilized by NASA for missions to Mars, drastically reducing their cost. The study notes, though, that it would be necessary to send robotic explorers to the Moon first to confirm that water and hydrogen are “economically accessible near the surface inside the lunar craters at the poles.”
The study also recommends creating an International Lunar Authority, “modelled after CERN,” to manage the combined business and technical risks of lunar operations. “A permanent commercial lunar base might substantially pay for its operations by exporting propellant to lunar orbit for sale to NASA and others to send humans to Mars, thus enabling the economic development of the Moon at a small marginal cost," it said.
At the moment, NASA does not have plans to return to the Moon. It is using its Asteroid Redirect Mission (ARM) – sending humans to an asteroid – as a cheaper stepping stone to Mars. But this study follows another by the National Research Council last year that suggests perhaps a return to the Moon would be a better option, and it might even be more economical.
“This is the way that America will settle the final frontier, save taxpayers money and usher in a new era of economic growth and STEM [science, technology, engineering, and math] innovation,” the Space Frontier Foundation’s Chairman of the Board, Jeff Feige, added in the statement.
All of that is very sound and doable but where is it in the Koran? For it to be done, doesn’t it have to involve muslim outreach?
In all seriousness though, very sensible. I couldn’t resist the current focus of Nasa humor.
I hope moonbase personnel will have a better fashion sense and not contract out furnishings to IKEA.
Build the Eagles, buggies, and U shaped blasters by all means.
Yup.
The study that never ends, and never flies.
"Nuclear reactors could provide power almost indefinitely. Greenhouses could maintain plant life. Animals could be bred and slaughtered. I would guess... that ah, dwelling space for several hundred thousands of our people could easily be provided. A computer could be set and programmed to accept factors from youth, health, sexual fertility, intelligence, and a cross section of necessary skills."
We have learned a lot about the formation of the solar system, the earth and the moon from the moon rocks we have already gathered. More missions will compound that knowledge. More missions and, hopefully a permanent base will only compound that knowledge and benefit our view of early earth. It’s clearly a step forward.
Getting to the moon has always been pretty cheap.
It's getting back alive that is expensive.
Sounds like shades of Project Orion!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yxMKwxO0oU0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xYoLcJuBtOw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V1vKMTYa40A
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Marching_Morons
“The Marching Morons” is a science fiction story written by Cyril M. Kornbluth, originally published in Galaxy in April 1951. It was included in The Science Fiction Hall of Fame, Volume Two after being voted one of the best novellas up to 1965.
The story is set hundreds of years in the future: the date is 7-B-936. John Barlow, a man from the past put into suspended animation by a freak accident involving a dental drill and anesthesia, is revived in this future. The world seems mad to Barlow until Tinny-Peete explains the Problem of Population: due to a combination of intelligent people not having children and excessive breeding by less intelligent people (see Fertility and intelligence), the world is full of morons, with the exception of an elite few who work slavishly to keep order. Barlow, who was a shrewd real estate con man in his day, has a solution to sell to the elite, in exchange for being made World Dictator.
I think it’s relevant to today, based on the two time election of Obama for starters.....
Nucular powered robots? That nucular part sounds dangerous. Don’t want it blowing up in the sky. We’ll pass. Next idea?
Of course it would be absolutely vital that our top government and military men be included to foster and impart the required principles of leadership and tradition.
It was published in Galaxy only a couple weeks after I was born...
Not sure if that means anything...lol
enter the spelling police...:-)
Nuclear
You certainly get to see art imitate life!
Yes.....unfortunately so..
Especially the fiction becoming reality.
It’s just part of the Muslim outreach approach: just take the train.
phrasing! /archer
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.