I thought with all your legal experience you would have had to be awake in Law School when they covered vehicular manslaughter.
Whooda known?
Are you avoiding a responsive answer to my question? As it is, you contend that the appellate courts are 40/60 in following the law.
Is your professional opinion that reciting the elements of the crime is sufficient basis for establishing probable cause?
For now, it's a hypothetical question, but it merits a direct answer.
My professional opinion is that as a matter of law, reciting the elements of the crime is insufficient basis for establishing probable cause.