[Cboldt]

Injuries are injuries, and I have utmost respect for those who carefully tend to the injured.

Are you avoiding a responsive answer to my question? As it is, you contend that the appellate courts are 40/60 in following the law.

Is your professional opinion that reciting the elements of the crime is sufficient basis for establishing probable cause?

For now, it's a hypothetical question, but it merits a direct answer.

My professional opinion is that as a matter of law, reciting the elements of the crime is insufficient basis for establishing probable cause.

[kiryandil]

He knows how to "do a little side-step", don't he?

If I was bored, I'd go back and check to see how many times he made a direct answer to the substance of a post, rather than a deflection onto a topic of HIS choice.