Watch this: Full Speech Trump Presidential Announcement

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2015/06/16/full_speech_donald_trumps_presidential_announcemen ^ | 6/16/2015 | Realclearpolitics

[dragnet2]

2 links one youtube same speech

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_q61B-DyPk

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2015/06/16/full_speech_donald_trumps_presidential_announcement.html

[dragnet2]

The guy thinks for himself, has produced results without suckling from the family tree, and isn't a McSheeple -- rainbow or otherwise.

Yep.

Lets see, who will I vote for?? A very successful guy who can't be bought off, a guy who built an empire, or another career bureaucrat on the payroll?

Tough choice.

[South40]

And, as he wrote in his book, he wants to ban certain guns. Based on cosmetics, of course.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3301079/posts

[dragnet2]

Dirt bag? Swine? Godless? Sick perverted love for money?

Is he the anti Christ too?

Anyway, not what I saw last night. In fact, I was even impressed with this guy’s daughter, who seemed very genuine and had great head on her shoulders.

Bet you didn’t watch the full speech. Watch it. I promise it won’t make ya grow horns or babble in voodoo chants.

[HLPhat]

>>Did you know he favors banning so-called "assault weapons" and is for extending the waiting periods for gun purchases?

"I generally oppose gun control, but I support the ban on assault weapons and I support a slightly longer waiting period to purchase a gun. With today’s Internet technology we should be able to tell within 72-hours if a potential gun owner has a record. Source: The America We Deserve, by Donald Trump, p.102 , Jul 2, 2000 "

http://www.ontheissues.org/Celeb/Donald_Trump_Gun_Control.htm

I'd like to hear his "assault weapon" reasoning.

72 hours doesn't sound too extended. 

How does the obsession with "assault weapons", on all sides, fit in with the other "created things" worshiped in Romans 1:25+?

Maybe if Bundybots and their ilk were a little more adept at exercising their 1st amendment responsibilities, and protecting the right of others to do so (instead of inflicting novelties like the Mormon Doctrine of Blood Atonement and other assorted state-established manure upon those within their purview)... the Left wouldn't have such a big target to shoot at.

[South40]

I'd like to hear his "assault weapon" reasoning.

As would I. When we understand that the left has ascribed the definition of "assault weapon" (a completely made up term) to any gun they deem "scary" looking, Trump has joined their lunacy in wanting to do the same. ANY gun can look scary to a lib. But Trump apparently thinks it should be banned on this basis alone. I would like to hear him clarify that position and/or defend it.

The waiting period is something the liberals cooked up because they think that anyone who buys a gun is doing so to murder someone and they need a couple of days to cool off. If Trump looks at gun owners as likely killers, he is no friend to the 2nd Amendment. Period.

[HLPhat]

>>a guy who built an empire,

Not once but several times, according to his bankruptcy record.

He’s not a quitter.

He’s gotten up off the canvas and come back from where others with quivering “party” character would’ve crawled off into in the corner and set about trying find the trigger with their toe.

[HLPhat]

How does the obsession with “assault weapons”, on all sides, fit in with the other “created things” worshiped in Romans 1:25+?

[South40]

Romans 1:25+ is your thing. I’m not interested, thanks.

[HLPhat]

>>Romans 1:25+ is your thing.

No, seems to be God’s thing.

---

Rom 1:25-26
25 They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator — who is forever praised. Amen.

26 Because of this, God gave them over...
NIV

---

How’s that workin’ for America?

I’ve run into a number of folks pushing the homosexual agenda who also quack a lot about the 2nd amendment.

Seems they’re sort of impotent to defend their reprobate nature otherwise.

[South40]

Your religious ramblings are of no interest to me. So if you can stay on topic, which is Donald Trump, we can continue. If not, we’re done.

[dragnet2]

He’s gotten up off the canvas and come back from where others with quivering “party” character would’ve crawled off into in the corner and set about trying find the trigger with their toe.

Or just raised our taxes while subsidizing continued endless failures and tens of millions of illegals who choked off our schools, jobs, jails, while gang raping all of our social services.

Amazing.

Better play is safe and stick with the tax payer humping bureaucrats and attorneys who are all on the government payroll. Lets keep it business as usual.

[HLPhat]

You mean the religious ramblings the 2nd amendment was intended to protect?

Like I said. If "conservatives" were more diligent in exercising those 1st amendment responsibilities, then Log Cabin RINOS wouldn't have taken over your precious Party. Then again, may that's not a concern to you.

Run along now and worship your Created Things, Rambo.

[HLPhat]

>>Your religious ramblings are of no interest to me

And BTW dufus, It’s not “religious” to recognize the self-evident FACT that Nature selected HETEROsexual reproduction and not the mutual-masturbation selected for worship by reprobate perverts.

Romans 1:25+ just illustrates the cycle of what happens when fools worship themselves and their state-established perversions instead of what Nature intended.

[HLPhat]

>>Better play is safe and stick with the tax payer humping
>>bureaucrats and attorneys who are all on the government
>>payroll. Lets keep it business as usual.

Yep, wouldn’t want to derail the L.I.F.E.R. gravy train to BOHICAville.

[South40]

Dufus? How Christian of you to resort to name calling when someone chooses not to listen to your religious ranting. Just as with your boy Trump you, too, are a fraud.

There is a religious forum at FR. But I'm sure you know that. You should keep your religious rambliings there. Bye.

[HLPhat]

Dufus, religious dogma is not required to recognize the self-evident FACT that nature select HETERO-sexual procreation, and not the mutual masturbation selected for worship by the Log Cabin RINOs controlling your precious “party”.

Are you for or against redefining marriage to suite the reprobately perverted “Conservative” {uhhhh} “progressive “ frauds running “The Party”?

At least Trump had the balls to answer the question.

[South40]

Not interested in anything you have to say, religious nutjob. And I didn't read a word of it. But by all means, keep wasting your time typing pointless posts that won't be read.

[HLPhat]

Thanks for your Fiscally Conservative RINO input.

Run along now and worship your Created Things.

[dragnet2]

Nobody will take Mr/ “You’re Fired” seriously. His hair will be a running joke. He is toxic.

Looking back at some of these dated posts, I would advise you and a few others not go into the political consulting business.

[TNMOUTH]

LOL...so, other than his immigration stance and his rhetoric, what is it that you like about Trump? His donation history? Single payer support? Oh, I know...his evolving on the 2nd Amendment? Maybe the tough stance on the Confederate flag? No, wait, I mean hi tough opposition to the recent SCOTUS rulings...oh, wait...