Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/24/2015 10:15:25 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 2ndDivisionVet

bflr.


2 posted on 05/24/2015 10:20:18 PM PDT by FredZarguna (We are vain and we are blind/I hate people when they're not polite.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
the international fusion reactor being built in France, will stand 10 stories tall, weigh three times as much as the Eiffel Tower, and cost its seven international partners $18 billion or more. The result of decades of planning, ITER will not produce fusion energy until 2027 at the earliest.

Ah yes, moving right along.......................Why the breathless article then?

Why not get back to the population when the damn thing works and produces net energy? Don't the wonks behind this stuff think enough is enough with the announcements of new breakthroughs?

3 posted on 05/24/2015 11:23:19 PM PDT by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“In nuclear physics, nuclear fusion is a nuclear reaction in which two or more atomic nuclei come very close and then collide at a very high speed and join to form a new type of atomic nucleus. During this process, matter is not conserved because some of the matter of the fusing nuclei is converted to photons (energy). Fusion is the process that powers active or “main sequence” stars.

The fusion of two nuclei with lower masses than iron (which, along with nickel, has the largest binding energy per nucleon) generally releases energy, while the fusion of nuclei heavier than iron absorbs energy. The opposite is true for the reverse process, nuclear fission. This means that fusion generally occurs for lighter elements only, and likewise, that fission normally occurs only for heavier elements. There are extreme astrophysical events that can lead to short periods of fusion with heavier nuclei. This is the process that gives rise to nucleosynthesis, the creation of the heavy elements during events such as supernovae.

Following the discovery of quantum tunneling by Friedrich Hund, in 1929 Robert Atkinson and Fritz Houtermans used the measured masses of light elements to predict that large amounts of energy could be released by fusing small nuclei. Building upon the nuclear transmutation experiments by Ernest Rutherford, carried out several years earlier, the laboratory fusion of hydrogen isotopes was first accomplished by Mark Oliphant in 1932. During the remainder of that decade the steps of the main cycle of nuclear fusion in stars were worked out by Hans Bethe. Research into fusion for military purposes began in the early 1940s as part of the Manhattan Project. Fusion was accomplished in 1951 with the Greenhouse Item nuclear test. Nuclear fusion on a large scale in an explosion was first carried out on November 1, 1952, in the Ivy Mike hydrogen bomb test.

Research into developing controlled thermonuclear fusion for civil purposes also began in earnest in the 1950s, and it continues to this day. The present article is about the theory of fusion. For details of the quest for controlled fusion and its history, see the article Fusion power.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_fusion


4 posted on 05/25/2015 12:32:30 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The Energy Source of Tomorrow: Benefits of Nuclear Fusion Power - Ivan Pogrebnyak

Abstract:

In the search for sources of energy, discussions of nuclear fusion power as an option have often been seen as unrealistic, overshadowed by the viability of nuclear fission. Fusion power, however, would be an ideal answer to our current demand for economical and environmentally friendly energy production. This article discusses the mechanics of nuclear fusion and explains that, in terms of safety, resource availability, cost, and waste management, fusion power may be the best commercial option in the near future.

See more at:
http://pitjournal.unc.edu/article/energy-source-tomorrow-benefits-nuclear-fusion-power#sthash.jgIzmGsS.dpuf


5 posted on 05/25/2015 12:37:37 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

We could have thousands of thorium reactors pumping out electricity merrily by then at a much smaller cost per watt.


6 posted on 05/25/2015 2:56:31 AM PDT by arthurus (It's true!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The Future of Fusion (then):

(Chick Corea & Dizzy Gillespie)

9 posted on 05/25/2015 4:59:28 AM PDT by 9thLife (The dream is free. The hustle is sold separately.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
When I started reading this, I thought Steak'n'Shake was getting into the fusion business.


10 posted on 05/25/2015 5:46:53 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson