[Alberta's Child]

The public announcement by the prosecutor's office, stating that the evidence cannot be released to the public before trial, tells you everything you need to know.

The issue at hand here has nothing to do with releasing the evidence "to the public." The attorneys for one of the defendants in this case have filed a motion to compel the prosecutor to turn the evidence over to them. I never went to law school, but I know that you don't answer a motion in a docketed court case by releasing a public statement claiming that you can't ethically do something that nobody is asking you to do anyway. You answer the motion in a response to the court, and if you don't have any arguments to oppose the motion then you should just admit that you are an incompetent affirmative-action hire, drop the charges, and find another career.

[iowacornman]

Excellent analysis. This case is built on a wishful lie. I really think we have a civil rights “1983” case big time by these public servants against this stupid bitch. Let’s watch!!

[Made In The USA]

Facts don’t matter for this elected official - she’s down wit da struggle yo!

Prosecute the prosecutor I’d say.