as a Catholic, if one of the tenets is the pope is infallible, and it is now obvious he is, where does that leave me?
He’s only infallible when speaking formally on faith and morals, and only then if it agrees with the constant teaching of the Church.
“Climate change” is not a matter for infallible pronouncement, just his personal opinion and something he thinks will gain him more of what he so eagerly craves, celebrityhood and the approval of the left.
So don’t worry about it.
You’re kidding, right?
He can also get math problems wrong.
Infallibility only applies to matters of Faith and Morals, as rendered Ex-cathedra.
In this case his advisor is scientifically compromised by his affiliations and the Pope is compromised by his exposure to Banana Republic Capitalism.
Pretty good article on that here (LINK)
The Pope is not, and does not claim to be, an all-purpose oracle on sports brackets, the stock market, or tomorrow's weather. Faith and morals only.
There are areas where a moral principle overlaps with what is called a prudential judgment (a judgment of fact). In this case, the Pope could, for instance, say with authority that it is morally wrong to intentionally destroy air/soil/water/crops ---resources needed for our neighbors' survival, or for future generations.
But he could not make an authoritative judgment about whether anthropogenic, carbon-driven, "global warming" or "climate disruption" is or is not happening, or even the opposite ("global cooling"?) or what its causes or remedies might be.
These are science questions, and as such, they are outside of his area of competence.