Posted on 04/23/2015 9:59:20 PM PDT by xuberalles
How can Ted Cruz be "too conservative" for America when an independent watchdog named Barack Hussein Obama the "most liberal" politician in Washington during his tenure as Senator? Contrary to progressive propaganda, America wasn't founded on Marxist or Islamic principles. This fabled nation was forged upon the timeless premise that man's natural rights are derived from God rather than the vain benevolence of any leader or the criminally usurped power of statism. Liberty, opportunity, God, faith, capitalism, hard work, self-reliance, accountability, and duty are hardly meaningless taglines used to lather up a Right Wing electorate into a frothing display of mindless jingoism; they are the universal building blocks of a free, prosperous and moral society. More significantly, these conservative principles are the constitutional crux of our Founding Fathers singular intent to erect the last, best hope of mankind.
The greatest trick the devil - i.e., the media - ever played was convincing the voting masses extremism doesn't pertain to the left side of the aisle. Anything but! Extremism and anti-Americanism is almost exclusive to leftist Democrats. Instead of asking conservative candidates whether or not they would attend a gay wedding, media pundits should be asking Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton why the American people should support anyone who gives billions in foreign aid, let alone permission to build nuclear arms, to a country that kills gays for merely existing and unrepentantly denies women basic human rights. Politics, not principles, conspires to condone injustice. One needs only to ask the RIGHT questions to unveil the truth.
This will explain it to you.
“However, if there is one man who can take the most credit for the 1965 act, it is John F. Kennedy. Kennedy seems to have inherited the resentment his father Joseph felt as an outsider in Boston’s WASP aristocracy. He voted against the McCarran-Walter Act of 1952, and supported various refugee acts throughout the 1950s. In 1958 he wrote a book, A Nation of Immigrants, which attacked the quota system as illogical and without purpose, and the book served as Kennedy’s blueprint for immigration reform after he became president in 1960. In the summer of 1963, Kennedy sent Congress a proposal calling for the elimination of the national origins quota system. He wanted immigrants admitted on the basis of family reunification and needed skills, without regard to national origin. After his assassination in November, his brother Robert took up the cause of immigration reform, calling it JFK’s legacy. In the forward to a revised edition of A Nation of Immigrants, issued in 1964 to gain support for the new law, he wrote, “I know of no cause which President Kennedy championed more warmly than the improvement of our immigration policies.” Sold as a memorial to JFK, there was very little opposition to what became known as the Immigration Act of 1965.”
Liberalism is The Borg. It’s proponents always express themselves in the abstract, as though speaking ex cathedra, usually starting with, “They shouldn’t be allowed ...”. They never express or imply an interest in their own status, which they take for granted.
The US Media has become the US ruling class’s Pravda.
Yep, No reason to apologize, it helps in no way.
This whole situation has taken a long time to happen so many, many people are really not seeing it for what it is yet.
May they wake up soon.
This would imply some sort of cataclysm, if history is any indication, which it is.
We might only hope that it is some sort of benign or abstract cataclysm, although I've never heard of any.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.