Posted on 04/05/2015 5:08:30 PM PDT by rightistight
A feminist magazine has declared that men who like breasts are sexist.
In an article titled, So Youre a Breasts Man? Here Are 3 Reasons That Could Be Sexist, Jenika McCrayer explains why men who are sexually attracted to women with breasts are misogynists.
McCrayer explains that under a patriarchal system were taught to believe that the female body exists solely for a mans sexual pleasure and entertainment. She then explains several reasons why liking breasts is a bad thing.
First, It Dangerously Conflates Attraction and Fetishization. She explains, breasts are not solely for aesthetic or sexual purposes. They have a function. And there are painful consequences to fetishizing body parts associated with womanhood.
More than that, its cisnormative to equate breasts with femininity and womanhood. Not everyone who has breasts is a woman, and not all women have breasts.
Second, Fetishization Leads to Objectification and Dehumanization. McCrayer writes, Reducing people to their anatomy creates this space that some if not most of us exist outside of because we dont fit into the male gazes narrow categories of what it means to be attractive or a woman.
(Excerpt) Read more at thepunditpress.com ...
So .. does this mean all these young ladies have to keep their clothes on ..??
Really ..??
That will be interesting for the Hollywood types who seem to interested in one thing - how much clothing they can take off. I don’t expect that to change.
"Hige sceal þe heardra, heorte þe cenre / mod sceal þe mare, þe ure mægen lytlað." "Thought must be the harder, heart be the keener / mind must be the greater, as our might lessens." |
|
Breasts are OK, but is it safe to think looking at a lasses legs repays the effort?
I came out in January as a flaming HETEROSEXUAL... now I’m a sexist too!
Cue the picture of Hillary staring at Agulera!!
No matter how many times you watch that there never going to pop out.
Naw, “cis” is the opposite of “trans”, meaning you’re actually happy with the harbles God gave you at birth.
LUCILLE!
What is the difference between a man standing on a street corner with a Bible in his hand, exhorting everyone around him that they were all going to hell, and this?
Isn’t this the VERY thing that Glenn Frey was singing about in that Paradise song? The one where all these people were trying to use some form of organized ideology to control everybody else?
Liberals are not statists. There needs to be a new, modern definition.
Here’s my stab:
Liberal - one active on behalf of people they don’t care about in order to control people they don’t like.
Liberals don’t care about blacks, gays, women, children, union members, etc. In fact, they hate them. They can’t stand them. The Soviets backed blacks in South Africa, but they didn’t give a fig about them. The world turned on the Afrikaners, and nobody cared when the blacks put tires around their necks, poured gasoline on them, and lit them on fire.
Liberals find gays to be sick, and at bottom, objects of amusement. However, some are rich, and many are willing to be used in order to retaliate against people that did them no harm in order to have revenge on people who wrong them long ago.
They sure as hell don’t care about Hispanics, or they wouldn’t be enticing 9 year olds to make the trip unaccompanied on some death train out of Guatemala.
Liberalism has debased itself into little more than organized exploitation.
What the right will not come to terms with is that it works.
It’s DINK (Margaret Nolan)! From GOLDFINGER!
If liking breasts is wrong, then I don’t want to be right.
Consider the author and the source:
Source: Everyday Feminism (webzine)
Author: Jenika McCrayer is a Contributing Writer for Everyday Feminism. A Virginia native with a BA in Women and Gender Studies from The College of William and Mary, she is currently pursuing an MA in the same field. This AmeriCorps alumna is passionate about community service and strives for a better understanding of how to mobilize marginalized populations through service and activism. Jenika also enjoys good books, bad horror films, naps, and the beach. Follow her on Twitter @JenikaMc.
Im sexist, racist, homophobe...and well-armed. Whatcha gonna do about it now, cupcake?
Any college major whose title ends with “Studies” is a worthless bunch of crap. I’ll hazard a guess that the lady is a phony who doesn’t really know her butt from a cork pistol.
Actually, I find it grimly amusing how the left uses fealty to neo-Darwinism as an anti-Christian shibboleth, while constantly rebelling against the obvious corollaries to a Darwinian description of human nature, e.g. in the subject of this thread, which as you point out is a matter of selection of mates for biological fitness, or for that matter in their nonsense with “gay marriage” — ‘traditional’ marriage being an institution with a Darwinian purpose, creating a lifelong bond between potential parents and grandparents so that human young will be cared for by genetically similar adults — or again, their bizarre insistence that differences in behavior, social outcomes and the like between human populations with ancestors that lived in radically different environments for tens, if not hundreds, of millenia must be the results of invidious discrimination, rather than actual biological differences in the populations.
A bunch of Penophobes!
Best way to shut up a feminazi.....politely inform them that the term feminist is gender specific, and therefore sexist and discriminatory. And then inform them that use of such sexist terms is highly offensive to you, and that it serves as a trigger for bad feelings.
As men I think we have tolerated this crap long enough.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.