Posted on 04/01/2015 2:15:15 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Sen. Ted Cruz, Republican from Texas, a few days ago became the first formally declared presidential candidate for next year’s election. Although Cruz is a Latino of Cuban-American background, I want to give five reasons (there are more) why most Latinos will not or should not support Cruz, who was just elected two years ago.
The first reason is that he seems to have little affinity with Latinos, including the large Mexican-American population in his own home state of Texas. Indeed, Cruz is an anomaly in that state due to his Cuban-American background. He was raised outside of the state and educated at Harvard. I don’t decry this but only point out that he has no historical roots in Texas as a Latino, much less as a Mexican-American. This does not mean that Cuban-Americans can’t identify with Mexican-Americans. Many do but Cruz does not appear to be one of these. Mexican-Americans and indeed other Latinos support candidates whom they feel truly represent their interests and whom they can feel an affinity toward. This does not just pertain to Latino candidates but to all candidates. Latinos including Mexican-Americans were enchanted with John F. Kennedy and even today revere him almost as a secular saint. They felt a bond as well with Bill Clinton who seemed to feel their pain and aspirations. They certainly have felt the same for President Obama, having overwhelmingly voted for him in 2008 and 2012. I don’t see the same reaction to Ted Cruz. If anything, most Latinos will support Hillary Clinton.
Secondly, Cruz is out of step with most Latinos on immigration. He supports a tough but insensitive approach that would continue deportations of undocumented immigrants, including those with U.S.-born children. He does not support the Dream Act that would give a pathway to legalization and citizenship to those young Latinos who were brought by their parents into the country as infants, and who have grown up as Americans, except that they do not have documents. Of course, Cruz opposes President Obama’s executive actions that would protect nearly five million undocumented with U.S.-born children from being deported, and which also increases the number of Dream Children who can qualify for temporary residency and a pathway to legalization and citizenship. Instead, Cruz plays up to the worst elements of our society, who seem to hate Latino immigrants (documented or undocumented) and who want to retain a predominantly white society.
Third, Cruz, since going to Washington, has been crusading to repeal Obamacare, totally insensitive to the fact that it has helped provide health insurance for thousands if not millions of previously uninsured Latinos, many of whom still need to be insured. These are working class people who previously could not afford health insurance and consequently did not go to doctors for themselves or their children. The only time they sought medical care was by going to emergency rooms where their costs were picked up by taxpayers, raising the costs of emergency care. Obamacare has helped to rectify much of this and Cruz seems to care less. It’s okay for him to have government healthcare as a U.S. senator, but not other Americans, including Latinos. Cruz’s position on healthcare is not only politically wrong: it is morally wrong.
Fourth, Cruz is opposed to other federal programs that assist Americans, including Latinos, in areas such as education, job retraining, home loan support, food stamps, the right of women for equal pay and the right of women to control their own bodies. He would do away with Medicare as we know it and endanger the Social Security system. All of these programs benefit Latinos, like other Americans, and Cruz would endanger them or eliminate them entirely.
Fifth and finally, Cruz believes in an American foreign policy that would lead to more military interventions in other parts of the world such as in the Middle East. Such interventions have taken a large toll on Latinos, since many are in the armed forces and pay the ultimate price through loss of lives or physical and mental injuries. With Cruz as president, more Latinos would be put in harm’s way by a president whose main response to foreign crises would be military intervention. Latinos cannot pay this price again.
There are other reasons why Latinos will not or should not support Ted Cruz or any other Latino candidate who works against their interests. As I have noted before, Latinos do not just instinctively vote for a Latino candidate. They don’t vote that way. They understand who feels for them and who supports programs that benefit them. Senator Ted Cruz does not qualify as one of these candidates.
********
Mario T. Garcia is Professor of History and Chicano Studies at the University of California, Santa Barbara. He is the author of many book on Chicano history including Chicano Catholic History. These include The Gospel of Cesar Chavez, Catolicos: Resistance and Affirmation in Chicano Catholic History and Chicano Liberation Theology: The Writings and Documents of Richard Cruz and Catolicos Por La Raza.
Cruz is a Houstonian.
The media sure works hard to separate republicans from Texas. I remember when the media portrayed H.W. Bush as being finished with pretending to live in Texas when he was leaving the White House, when actually he moved back to Texas and has been there ever since.
George W. has always gotten the same treatment, and now Cruz.
> When the interstellar economy comes back, custom shaped planets with options in fjords will be back in style.
Soro’s check is in the mail
“Shouldn’t”?? Whiteys dictating to minorities on how to vote? That’s racist.
“Cruz isn’t an authentic latino because he doesn’t have the correct politics.”
He’s too successful and married a white woman and has a white mother. He’s not “pure” enough.
Obama 102 isn’t an authentic black, he is bi racial.
Why is it that Tiger Woods acknowledges the background of both parents and not Obama 102, is it because he has an 102 IQ score and doesn’t know he is bi racial?
Yeah, but your minority half only counts if you’re a Democrat.
Catholics are a democrat voting denomination, so it is easier to label which of their publications would not be liberal, or moderate, almost non are truly conservative, although some are right of center, or republican supporting.
“chicano” studies? Isn’t that racist or something?
What a bunch of BS.
National Catholic Reporter is a lefty raglit, as opposed to the National Catholic Register, which is traditional.
I do think most know that the Church has been openly and obviously infiltrated with socialists or worse, but many are devout and traditional. The traditional are somewhat at the mercy of the socialist crowd who have gained influence.
Cruz did just fine with Latino American voters in his Texas senate win. Like the so called “peaceful Muslims” who deplore the radicals of their religion, there are an abundance of Latino Americans who deplore the socialist radicals of their race.
At least there are plenty in Texas, so the writer whistles Dixie past the facts.
Absolute moron and a professor no less.
Mario T. Garcia is struggling to hide his bigotry.
Thank you!
I am both an American of Mexican decent, and a faithful Catholic. Neither this socialist tool nor the quisling rag he writes for represent my views. There are many more like me, and many, many more who would be if they could be deprogrammed from their leftist brainwashing.
The Mexicans that are out here in Az do, every May 5th.
They speak of it as a celebration and go to the restaurants that yes, are making money on it. But they offer it because the places are jammed.
I got in trouble at work once for asking what are they celebrating. It was taken in a negative way, but I meant it as a real question, because they were talking about it as a celebration.
The Mexicans are using it that way.
That's history, today Catholics are changing their politics to reflect the morals they grew up with. I see it on discussion boards where those solid vote democrats are a minority. I believe a majority of those voting for Obama were CINOs.
Yes it is history, and current history as well.
The Catholic vote goes democrat.
Yeh, it's pretty hard to keep track of catholics in the last fifty year, let alone pope francis...
Before I get crucified, I was raised as a catholic, until I was 9 years old and started to watch the whole thing fall apart.
FMCDH(BITS)
The majority of Catholics who actually go to church regularly vote Republican.
The majority of White Catholics vote Republican.
There are more Catholic Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives than Catholic Democrats.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.