Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Online poll: Do you support the Indiana bill allowing business owners to reject LGBT customers?
Fox 59 ^ | 3/31/2015 | Fox 59

Posted on 03/31/2015 8:51:54 AM PDT by sickoflibs

The Governor of Indiana supports a bill that will give business owners the freedom to turn away LGBT customers. Do you support this bill?

61% No, I do not. What's next...denying someone service because you don't like their hairstyle?

32% Yes, I do support it wholeheartedly

7% What is LGBT?


TOPICS: Government; Politics; Religion
KEYWORDS: gays; homosexualagenda; rfra
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: sickoflibs

I thought the law only provided leeway for business owners to refuse to provide services for gay weddings. What am I missing here?


21 posted on 03/31/2015 9:05:42 AM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tophat9000
RE :”The boycotter say hey say they will not provide services to Indiana because they do not like something about Indiana and its people...... so how come it ok to deny service to Indiana but not the other way around?...sounds very very hypocritical to me”

I think its ‘provide services or spend $$$’ IN Indiana, not ‘to Indiana’.

But you are on to something there...that's a better argument then I hear on TV.

22 posted on 03/31/2015 9:09:03 AM PDT by sickoflibs (King Obama : 'The debate is over. The time for talk is over. Just follow my commands you serfs""')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

That is NOT what this law does.


23 posted on 03/31/2015 9:09:28 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

The poll is about Amanda Knox. Did they change it all of a sudden? Was our side in the majority, thus the decision to move on to another question?


24 posted on 03/31/2015 9:12:31 AM PDT by Liberty1st
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei
RE :”I thought the law only provided leeway for business owners to refuse to provide services for gay weddings. What am I missing here?”

I think the bill doesn't mention gays or gay weddings, its general enough in verbiage that it would apply to those businesses who object to mixed race couples by claiming its religious grounds, which would be rejected by the court regardless.

25 posted on 03/31/2015 9:13:47 AM PDT by sickoflibs (King Obama : 'The debate is over. The time for talk is over. Just follow my commands you serfs""')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

I want to see a clan rally hire a black family to cater their gathering. Think they could conceincesly object, and refuse?


26 posted on 03/31/2015 9:14:15 AM PDT by bird4four4 (God Damn America!!! - Mr. Wright, your prayer has been answered 11-4-08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei
I think this is it.

Indiana General Assembly :Senate Bill 568 : Religious freedom restoration act

Religious freedom restoration act. Provides that a state or local government action may not substantially burden a person's right to the exercise of religion unless it is demonstrated that applying the burden to the person's exercise of religion is: (1) essential to further a compelling governmental interest; and (2) the least restrictive means of furthering the compelling governmental interest. Provides that a person whose exercise of religion has been substantially burdened, or is likely to be substantially burdened, by a state or local government action may assert the burden as a claim or defense in a judicial proceeding, regardless of whether the state or a political subdivision of the state is a party to the judicial proceeding. Allows a person who asserts a burden as a claim or defense to obtain appropriate relief, including: (1) injunctive relief; (2) declaratory relief; (3) compensatory damages; and (4) recovery of court costs and reasonable attorney's fees.

27 posted on 03/31/2015 9:17:33 AM PDT by sickoflibs (King Obama : 'The debate is over. The time for talk is over. Just follow my commands you serfs""')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

Next Job for you Governor is to end the HIGH Crime rates in your home town of Indianapolis and Gary as a start.

It’s OK to kill people in Indianapolis but it’s not OK for some to keep CAKE from Queers?


28 posted on 03/31/2015 9:17:56 AM PDT by TNoldman (AN AMERICAN FOR A MUSLIM/BHO FREE AMERICA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

“Well its got legs because Pence was asked 3X by George Stephanopolus on ABC Sunday if it does allows a flowerist to discriminate against gay couples, and he refused to answer,”

The Governor is a dull blade who should answer, “it does not, it discriminates against no one”.

He shouldn’t go on these propaganda programs if he doesn’t have his act together.


29 posted on 03/31/2015 9:19:27 AM PDT by ifinnegan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: bird4four4
RE :”I want to see a clan rally hire a black family to cater their gathering. Think they could conceincesly object, and refuse?’

Now that's a good analogy , some of the others floating around are not very good.

30 posted on 03/31/2015 9:19:30 AM PDT by sickoflibs (King Obama : 'The debate is over. The time for talk is over. Just follow my commands you serfs""')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

Support gays (or any progressives really) boycotting states. encourage them to move out of any state that “discriminates” against them!
Ask them if the need any help loading the moving truck.:)


31 posted on 03/31/2015 9:21:52 AM PDT by Leep (Ronney/McCain 2016!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

I support a bill forcing business owners to do whatever the customer sees fit.


32 posted on 03/31/2015 9:23:56 AM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

First things first, I am more concerned about Iran having nukes.


33 posted on 03/31/2015 9:28:08 AM PDT by Big Horn (Rebuild the GOP to a conservative party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

Not against serving LGBT customers. But against catering to homosexuals ‘marriages’.


34 posted on 03/31/2015 9:30:11 AM PDT by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
The law needs to be rewritten:

Muslim business owners do not have to allow women with exposed skin to enter their store. Or to server anyone wearing a shirt making fun of Mohammed. Because of the 14th amendment, similar rights must be given to non-Muslim business owners.

Get the left arguing that Muslims need to serve people making fun of Mohammed instead of just showing their disgust for Christians.
35 posted on 03/31/2015 9:30:23 AM PDT by LostPassword
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan
RE :”The Governor is a dull blade who should answer, “it does not, it discriminates against no one”.
He shouldn’t go on these propaganda programs if he doesn’t have his act together.”

George Steph kept asking questions.

He found some writing of a bill supporter who said that the bill will allow a flowerist to refuse to serve a gay couple, similar to that WA case, and asked Pence if that was true.

36 posted on 03/31/2015 9:31:17 AM PDT by sickoflibs (King Obama : 'The debate is over. The time for talk is over. Just follow my commands you serfs""')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

“George Steph kept asking questions.”

Any politician who cannot outwit this fool doesn’t deserve to be in power, period!


37 posted on 03/31/2015 9:35:39 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (My Batting Average( 1,000) (GOPe is that easy to read))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Big Horn
RE :”First things first, I am more concerned about Iran having nukes.”

Whats the difference if we cant marry to *person* of our choice and then get the state to force businesses with owners who object to it to sanctify the wedding by photo-shooting it?

If Christians can refuse then we might as well be in Iran.

38 posted on 03/31/2015 9:36:15 AM PDT by sickoflibs (King Obama : 'The debate is over. The time for talk is over. Just follow my commands you serfs""')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

It’s not the customer who is being rejected. It’s the option to be involved with sinful acts.


39 posted on 03/31/2015 9:46:51 AM PDT by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

That is not what the law does.


40 posted on 03/31/2015 9:55:42 AM PDT by WriteOn (Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson