Posted on 03/21/2015 2:39:51 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Newswise SAN DIEGO, CA (March 16, 2015) - Researchers at UC San Diego and Creighton University have challenged the intake of vitamin D recommended by the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) Institute of Medicine (IOM), stating that their Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) for vitamin D underestimates the need by a factor of ten.
In a letter1 published last week in the journal Nutrients the scientists confirmed a calculation error noted by other investigators, by using a data set from a different population. Dr. Cedric F. Garland, Dr.P.H., adjunct professor at UC San Diegos Department of Family Medicine and Public Health said his group was able to confirm findings published by Dr. Paul Veugelers2 from the University of Alberta School of Public Health that were reported last October in the same journal.
Both these studies suggest that the IOM underestimated the requirement substantially, said Garland. The error has broad implications for public health regarding disease prevention and achieving the stated goal of ensuring that the whole population has enough vitamin D to maintain bone health.
The recommended intake of vitamin D specified by the IOM is 600 IU/day through age 70 years, and 800 IU/day for older ages. Calculations by us and other researchers have shown that these doses are only about one-tenth those needed to cut incidence of diseases related to vitamin D deficiency, Garland explained.
Robert Heaney, M.D., of Creighton University wrote: "We call for the NAS-IOM and all public health authorities concerned with transmitting accurate nutritional information to the public to designate, as the RDA, a value of approximately 7,000 IU/day from all sources.
This intake is well below the upper level intake specified by IOM as safe for teens and adults, 10,000 IU/day, Garland said. Other authors were C. Baggerly and C. French, of GrassrootsHealth, a voluntary organization in San Diego CA, and E.D. Gorham, Ph.D., of UC San Diego.
About GrassrootsHealth:
GrassrootsHealth is a nonprofit public health research organization dedicated to moving public health messages regarding vitamin D from science into practice. GrassrootsHealth is currently running the D*action population intervention program to solve the vitamin D epidemic worldwide. Under the D*action umbrella, there are programs looking at the entire population as well as targeted programs for breast cancer prevention and a newly announced Protect Our Children NOW! program to reduce the complications of vitamin D deficiency encountered during pregnancy and childhood.
# # #
1Heaney, R.P. et al. 2015. Letter to Veugelers, P.J. and Ekwaru, J.P., A Statistical Error in the Estimation of the Recommended Dietary Allowance for Vitamin D. Nutrients 2014, 6, 44724475; doi:10.3390/nu6104472 URL: http://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/7/3/1688
2Veugelers, P.J. et al. 2014. A Statistical Error in the Estimation of the Recommended Dietary Allowance for Vitamin D. Nutrients 2014, 6(10), 4472-4475; doi:10.3390/nu6104472 URL: http://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/6/10/4472/htm.
So, what is the practical affect of this? Do we now drink 10 glasses of milk a day?
Now we have to ‘mainline’ vitamin D?
I take 5,000 IU once a day. Not expensive.
I take 5000 IU a day for three years and I rarely get sick and the few times I did catch something, it was very mild and maybe lasted a day..
I swear by the stuff...
Not unless you want to look like an Orca-vitamin D supplement tablets are inexpensive-I’ve ingested 6-7000 IU daily for years.
B4L8r
How does one get that much vitamin D in a balanced diet?
I take a supplement in the winter because I live in the north ...but as soon as the weather allows I spend as much time as possible outdoors..
Also people need to cut back on sunscreens.. they block the positive effect of the sun..
Are they talking about Vitamin D3? I was thinking about boosting my intake, but it looks like I may have to increase the intake much more than I thought!
Ditto
supplements
Yes, Vitamin D3.
If you have to take supplements to reach a target quantity, the target quantity is wrong.
“I take 5,000 IU once a day. Not expensive.”
****************************************************************
Me too (D3)—at my doctor’s recommendation. Lab test of D levels in the blood is now part of routine annual physical exams for many physicians. Low D levels are common.
You can hang out in the sun instead.
get sunlight on your skin - no sunscreen.
For how long now? You've suffered no ill effects?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.