Replies

To: 2ndDivisionVet; stephenjohnbanker; Gilbo_3; Impy; NFHale; GOPsterinMA; BillyBoy; fieldmarshaldj

80 posted on 03/11/2015 10:08:03 PM PDT by sickoflibs (King Obama : 'The debate is over. The time for talk is over. Just follow my commands you serfs""')

To: 2ndDivisionVet; stephenjohnbanker; Gilbo_3; Impy; NFHale; GOPsterinMA; BillyBoy; fieldmarshaldj; ...

Another reason why Star Trek is superior to Star Wars. The gaystapo has been DEMANDING an "openly gay Star Trek character" for at least 20 years. The response of the-powers-that-be (whoever is in charge of the franchise at that time) has always been "Wow! I didn't realize Star Trek has NEVER had a gay character! We MUST make an effort to be more inclusive. We'll definitely work on including one in the next movie/TV series". Then its tossed on the back burner and the following Star Trek incarnation is 100% homo free.

It drives the homo mafia nuts that Star Trek had the "first inner racial kiss" on TV but isn't "progressive" enough to include a homo for the sake of including a homo.

>> I thought Jar Jar Binks was the first Star Wars gay character. <<

Nope C3PO, way back in 1977. He may not be officially out of the closet, but the dude is gayer than Richard Simmons.

81 posted on 03/11/2015 10:52:19 PM PDT by BillyBoy (Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)

To: sickoflibs; 2ndDivisionVet; stephenjohnbanker; Gilbo_3; Impy; GOPsterinMA; BillyBoy; ...

92 posted on 03/12/2015 2:05:00 PM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794