Posted on 02/26/2015 9:35:27 PM PST by Ray76
Internet is a medium by which every one may publish to every one.
The medium must not can not be regulated.
Regulation is an abridgment of the freedom of speech and of "the press"
Internet is “the tyrant’s foe, and the people’s friend”
The FCC is seizing control of the medium. They claim laws of the 1930's as their authority. The 1930's are well before computers and internet existed.
The FCC has no authority to regulate the medium. There can be no authority to control the medium.
Get online right now and buy 5.56 ammo. Whether or not you have a gun chambered in that round, you’ll thank me later.
The 1930’s called, they want their phone regulations back...
Screw the FCC
Fundamental transformation means destruction of the Constitution, especially the Bill of Rights. The only president in history that the media never vetted never really mentioned constitutional rights in his speeches, did he?
He sure did talk about not liking so-called “negative liberties”—which indicates an anti-Christian stance since the Ten Commandments are 80 percent in “negative” language (reading “Thou shalt not” etc.).
“Content must be just and reasonable.” If you and I separately listed what consists of just and reasonable content, I’m sure our lists would be quite different in detail. However, Obama and his crowd will be more precise as they’ve given a lot of thought to that. FR like the TEA Party are already defined as dangerously radical, racist and unacceptable. SPLC will be helpful in excluding dangerous content from the net.
But obama he is sure that he is right about this and everything else too.
Also, being against the Ten Commandments and their “negative liberties” indicates antisemitism.
Precisely. They will have the SPLC and the like bring suits for the sole purpose of “establishing evidence” that there is some “injustice” that must be “corrected”.
It’s a scam.
[[“Content must be just and reasonable.”]]
Yes, because that is what free speech is all about- you are free to give an opinion as long as it agrees with liberal standards/ideology, otherwise you are not free to voice your opinion.
Christians will no logner be allowed to quote from the bible because according to liberals, the bible is ‘full of hateful rhettoric’ and people will no logner be able to be critical of radical Islamic terrorists because according to the left, criticism of terrorists is considered hate speech
In fact, any speech critical of liberal agendas will be considered either hate4 speech, or an infringement on someone’s ‘right not to be offended’
However, when it comes to offending conservatives well then, conservatives will have no right objecting to the offensive material because then they’ll be infringing on ‘free speech’
See how that works? Simple- They gots it all figured out for us
… That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends (to secure these … certain inalienable Rights), it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. …
Zactly...
Just how many of these regulatory bodies are there that are answerable to no one? We know about the FCC and the EPA, but how many ohers are there?
If they manage some how to do this .. I’m gone off the net.
In fact, I was about ready to do it anyway .. just because.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Yep, buy it!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.