‘Nailed it!’ Martha MacCallum lays the ‘Jihadi John’ truth-boom down on Marie Harf

Twitchy.com ^ | 02/26/2015 | Twitchy Staff

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Now that we know a little more about the ISIS beheader known as “Jihadi John” and his “well-to-do” family and college education, Fox News’ Martha MacCallum sums up just how devastating this news is to Marie Harf’s #JobsForISIS narrative:

[HotHunt]

To each his own. You need to "slide over to CNN" and watch some of the liberal crap they spew over there on a regular basis. Megyn Kelly looks far-right conservative in comparison.

I'm just sayin'.....

[Scrambler Bob]

OK, I see the Blonde, but where’s the maze?

[JimRed]

Megyn grills our side as hard as she does the other side, but never with a “have you stopped beating your wife yet” MSNBC type of gotcha. That’s one of the things I like about her.

[hoosiermama]

Being on a debate team in high school I recognized that she was merely setting up the desired results. It’s also a technique a good lawyer uses with a with was on the stand to get the entire truth out. IMO she did such a masterful job that many were unaware of her manipulations.
She actually does it much more masterfully then others on FOX

[Thank You Rush]

“”Being on a debate team in high school I recognized that she was merely setting up the desired results. It’s also a technique a good lawyer uses with a with was on the stand to get the entire truth out. IMO she did such a masterful job that many were unaware of her manipulations.
She actually does it much more masterfully then others on FOX””

Sorry but that sounds like Harf’s “too nuanced for you” retort. Exactly what were the “desired results” she achieved?

[hoosiermama]

Wasn’t talking about Harf. She’s an airhead who has no control or understanding of logic A parrot — product of public education who only regurgitates what she’s been fed.

[Thank You Rush]

I’ll try again.....I know you weren’t talking about Harf so you missed the meaning of my first reply entirely. I was merely comparing your reply to HARF in which you said that Megan did a masterful job and many were unaware of her manipulations. Did that not parrot Harf and her nuanced remark? You said Megan did her segment with Rudy exactly right to achieve the desired results and I asked you what results she had achieved.... Your reply still didn’t answer that.

“”Being on a debate team in high school I recognized that she was merely setting up the desired results. It’s also a technique a good lawyer uses with a with was on the stand to get the entire truth out. IMO she did such a masterful job that many were unaware of her manipulations.
She actually does it much more masterfully then others on FOX””

Sorry but that sounds like Harf’s “too nuanced for you” retort. Exactly what were the “desired results” she achieved?

[hoosiermama]

Megyn allowed Gulliani to reinforce and augment his original premise