I’ll try again.....I know you weren’t talking about Harf so you missed the meaning of my first reply entirely. I was merely comparing your reply to HARF in which you said that Megan did a masterful job and many were unaware of her manipulations. Did that not parrot Harf and her nuanced remark? You said Megan did her segment with Rudy exactly right to achieve the desired results and I asked you what results she had achieved.... Your reply still didn’t answer that.
“”Being on a debate team in high school I recognized that she was merely setting up the desired results. It’s also a technique a good lawyer uses with a with was on the stand to get the entire truth out. IMO she did such a masterful job that many were unaware of her manipulations.
She actually does it much more masterfully then others on FOX””
Sorry but that sounds like Harf’s “too nuanced for you” retort. Exactly what were the “desired results” she achieved?
Megyn allowed Gulliani to reinforce and augment his original premise