Really?
How about the Oklahoma beheader, the Boston marathon bombers, the Fort Hood muslim terrorist, etc, etc...
This is how lies start.
The left again wringing their hands over their favorite "victim" group.
Islamist Murderer at the Jewish Federation of Greater Seattle.
(totally rolling eyes skyward in disbelief)
A woman named Goldberg is upset - as usual - about white males? And this one not even a Christian?
Good luck sweetie. If you want to believe the fiction that the Muslims are just misunderstood, you go right ahead.
They have a special destiny for the People of the Book as they call you. And it isn’t pretty.
But if you prefer that....
Indeed. How much of this have we had in the past twenty years, or thirty, or even forty? Muslim attacks outweigh incidents like this greatly—and the left has to be out of its collective skull over the fact that this attack was done by one of their own.
The guy was a liberal, atheist nut job. Hmmm, try spelling that out, then align it to Bill Ayers and Obama. That would show a bit of a trend.
Based on the title, had they said a half white man with a cell phone and a grudge I would have known they were referring to zero.
The Most Common Type of Progressive Idiot Is a Man-Hating White Woman With a Low IQ and a Grudge (this means you, Michelle Goldberg)
What could this Jewish leftist possibly gain by defending a group of people that are hell bent on her people’s (both Jews’ and leftists’) extermination?
Note no proof offered..
And here I thought it was a white faggot with a left-wing blog.
yep.. they’re ALWAYS Christian, white, gun-owners who read their Bibles, believe in our nation’s founders, don’t like paying high taxes and kill in the name of Jeeeeesus!
This profile fits every time!
And of course batsh*t crazy. But that comes with being a leftist atheist (albeit I don't know if that world-view led to the craziness, or whether being crazy led to adopting that world-view).
This is just a case of an uninformed commentator cherry-picking only those characteristics that fit her narrative. Beyond that, it really isn't worth noticing.
In speaking against “conspiracy theorizing,” Michelle Goldberg makes two baseless comments demonstrating a crazy imagination, if not outright wackiness bordering on superstition:
“they’ve picked up broader currents of hatred and conspiracy theorizing”
“the most common type of American terrorist: a white man with a weapon and a grudge”
and a deliberately deceptive distortion of the truth:
“Explicitly atheist violence is unusual.”
Shat about the fact that young black men comprise only about 2% of the population yet account for nearly half of all murders?
John Allen Muhammad and Lee Boyd Malvo ...
To start, this guy is not a terrorist. He was not trying to terrorize any third parties by killing the victims. He was not even trying to terrorize the victims. He was trying to kill them. He was a terrorist only in the liberal definition that holds that anyone who disagrees with Liberal orthodoxy or harms members of a Liberal domestic pet group is a terrorist
Ideological violence in the liberal dictionary is simply political noncongruence with liberal orthodoxy.
Michelle Goldberg, the author. You can’t make this up.
If we’re counting numbers of dead bodies, morgues full, stacks of them, you can’t beat the feral young black man in the Hood year after year.