Posted on 02/07/2015 11:34:57 AM PST by rightistight
In a stunningly evil and disgusting article, a feminist only willing to identify herself as “Lana” has described her decision to abort her child, based solely on the fact that he was a boy.
Lana begins her article by explaining that “the patriarchy has been well entrenched since the dawn of time,” and continues by writing about an argument she had with a man on an airplane, while she was pregnant, to summarize what she deemed “extreme patriarchy.”
The description of the argument is straight forward: Lana was flying to San Francisco to participate in an Occupy Wall Street rally. When the person sitting next to her found out about it, he swore at her, to which Lana responded by screaming at the top of her lungs “ASSAULT.”
After “contemplating” lying to the flight attendants and telling them that the man struck her, Lana decided to tell the truth. The flight attendants told her that they couldn’t force the man to move in response. And in response to that, Lana decided that she “could no longer depend on men to be an ally of the cause.”
The “cause,” in her mind, is feminism. Soon after, she went to the doctor and was told that she was pregnant with a boy. Her immediate response, she writes, was “my body had betrayed me even worse than the misogynistic suit jockey on the airplane so many months before. I was in shock, I started crying, weeping at the thought of what I was about to curse the world with.”
Over the course of several days, she decided that she could not bring another male into this world. She explains, “I couldn’t bring another monster into the world. We already have enough enemies as it is.”
(Excerpt) Read more at thepunditpress.com ...
“And uh, how did she get pregnant?”
Going to tell you all this. I’m a big fan of Wonder Woman Comics. Know Diana Princes’ whole back ground. On Paradise Island, where the Amazons live no man is allowed. The women would leave the Island in order to become pregnant. If the child was female they of course kept her and raised her among the Amazons. If the child was male he was sent back to the father and off the Island. Why? Because even being Amanzons they knew they would need a man to become pregnant in the future even if their society did not allow for men in it. Even the Amazons, in Charles Moulton’s story were not that blood thirsty.
Probably a test tube baby
Our society has degraded to the point where savages who practice human sacrifice are celebrated and defended.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.