Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
To: rightistight
Newspaper is supported by taxpayer dollars to university who charge students tax-payer supported tuition loans.
What a country!
2 posted on
12/24/2014 11:28:40 AM PST by
Steelfish
To: rightistight
If I wrote that it is time for violently taking Washington D.C. (when there is not a Hawaii Vacation happening) and haul all the tyrants out of their offices and drown them all in the Potomac River... is that protected Free Speech?
3 posted on
12/24/2014 11:30:19 AM PST by
Rodamala
To: rightistight
pull their taxpayer funding
To: rightistight
5 posted on
12/24/2014 11:30:33 AM PST by
lowbridge
To: rightistight
If you aren’t liberal when you enter college, you are programmed in that direction. If you are liberal, the indoctrination is directed to socialism, communism, anarchy,and now, apparently lawlessness and murder.
Everything has been turned upside down in six short years. A fundamental transformation.
To: rightistight
7 posted on
12/24/2014 11:31:24 AM PST by
dware
("White Privilege" stems from one's ability to lace up work boots and read a work schedule)
To: rightistight
They need to shut that newspaper down. Free Speech does not include the right to incite violence.
8 posted on
12/24/2014 11:31:56 AM PST by
ThomasMore
(Islam is the Whore of Babylon!)
To: rightistight
To: rightistight
> Oppression at the hands of the capitalist state
There it is.
And they agitate for violence. Subversion is a crime. It’s time they are prosecuted.
10 posted on
12/24/2014 11:33:01 AM PST by
Ray76
(Who gave the stand down order in Ferguson? Who gave the stand down order in Benghazi?)
To: rightistight
12 posted on
12/24/2014 11:33:47 AM PST by
Lazamataz
("Two parties, governing AGAINST the will of the people, not with the consent of the governed." --MrB)
To: rightistight
sounds like something you could be arrested for
14 posted on
12/24/2014 11:34:52 AM PST by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
To: rightistight
Defending yourself against an oppressive state is supposed to be every American's birthright.
"Defending" yourself against law enforcement as they attempt to apprehend you for stealing, assaulting, murdering, etc someone else is not.
15 posted on
12/24/2014 11:36:26 AM PST by
skeeter
To: rightistight
“Comments Are Closed” at the bottom of the CUNY article. Cowards.
To: rightistight
17 posted on
12/24/2014 11:36:41 AM PST by
joshua c
(Please dont feed the liberals)
To: rightistight
CUNY used to be called the Poor Man’s Harvard. People from non-WASP backgrounds whom were not allowed to go to the Ivy League flocked to CUNY. CUNY allowed ethnic whites and minorities to achieve the American dream. The 60s destroyed that as CUNY went from being one of the most selective institution in the country to open admissions. You can the result as CUNY is not just a shadow of its former self. They used to have that Black racist Jefferies on its faculty. This scum bag editor-in-chief Marxist revolutionary wanna be is just the latest example of who no serious student would attend CUNY.
20 posted on
12/24/2014 11:38:45 AM PST by
C19fan
To: rightistight
There once was a thug named Brown
Who bum-rushed a cop with a frown
Six bullets later he met his creator
And his homies burnt down the town.
22 posted on
12/24/2014 11:42:27 AM PST by
Ouderkirk
(To the left, everything must evidence that this or that strand of leftist theory is true)
To: rightistight
The Nazis had Goebbels and the Black War on our police have their propagandists. The Only difference is Goebbels spoke German.
25 posted on
12/24/2014 11:45:48 AM PST by
jmaroneps37
(Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
To: rightistight
If the violence was to be organized, and the protestors armed more so than the few that sparingly are then the brunt of social pressures would not be laid onto middling proprietors, but unto those deserving the most virulent response of an enraged populace.
"those deserving the most virulent response of an enraged populace" can be assumed to be cops, right?
If so, and if
this ABC News article is correct, rather than being "enraged" the "populace" is ... increasingly SUPPORTING the cops.
As said before, jacka**es like this guy need to read up on their Thomas Sowell (
here and
here ) and look at some statistics regarding population demographics and gun ownership.
The conclusion is that if the violence becomes organized and focused, the "enraged populace" is going to be standing WITH the cops, not against them. And they'll probably be well armed in doing so.
To: rightistight
27 posted on
12/24/2014 11:49:33 AM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Any energy source that requires a subsidy is, by definition, "unsustainable.")
To: rightistight
The time for peace has passed, indeed it never existed in this country, the editorial explains. It doesnt matter if Brown robbed a convenience store, or even if he assaulted Wilson."
28 posted on
12/24/2014 11:51:39 AM PST by
TigersEye
(ISIS is the tip of the spear. The spear is Islam.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson