Drowning was an initial guess by the coroner or the police, which is reasonable. Drawing unreasonable conclusions from it makes some conservatives look like kooks.
And the unreasonable conclusion is what?
When a coroner makes a Preliminary Cause of Death is Drowning, after the autopsy and based on the autopsy, as the evidence shows, it is not a best guess. It is a cause of death.
“Drowning was an initial guess by the coroner or the police, which is reasonable. Drawing unreasonable conclusions from it makes some conservatives look like kooks.”
How do you prove “heart arrhythmia”?
According to those closest to here she had no heart problems.
Pretty easy to prove or disprove drowning.
So, we are to believe that someone with no prior heart problems, who BTW was instrumental in “proving” Obama’s citizenship, just happened to be involved in an airplane crash. And after the crash, became unresponsive. So her assistant just let her drift away? And, lo and behold, was the only passenger who had any problems? And the original cause of death, drowning, was replaced by the verdict of heart arrhythmia. A cause of death that can’t be proven or disproven.
I have no idea what happened. I do know that first responders said she drowned. Wearing a life jacket. But that’s not suspicious? She was also, from what I understand an accomplished swimmer. I could understand if someone who could not swim would become panicked floating in the ocean wearing a life jacket. But an accomplished swimmer? And there seems to be, from official reports, a need to be sure everyone knows that she was “elderly”. 65 is elderly? I guess. I guess the elderly can’t swim either. With a life jacket.
There is no doubt that the original cause of death was drowning. And there is no doubt that it was changed. Changed to a cause that cannot be disproved. Was it changed because drowning, based on the circumstances, made no sense? Or was it based on facts? Seeing how a cause of death by heart arrhythmia is basically just a wild ass guess in this case I would guess that there is cause for suspicion. And calling people who question this “kooks” sounds pretty trollish to me.
Did you even read the report?
“Drowning was an initial guess by the coroner or the police, which is reasonable. Drawing unreasonable conclusions from it makes some conservatives look like kooks.”
Birfers are not conservatives, they are just plain kooks. Birther Report is a website for lunatics that think that Ted Cruz is ineligible to be President. From what little I read of it they also think that the Sandy Hook massacre never happened. Real nuts.
The preliminary cause of death (drowninq) was stated by Det. Jamie Winfrey after the autopsy was done on Dec 13, 2013.
Later in the day Winfrey siqned the Inquest sayinq that cause of death was cardiac arrhythmia due to stress.
Did the medical examiner (Dr. Lindsey Harle, who was on the island of Maui at the time that the autopsy was done on the island of Molokai...) see water in Loretta Fuddy’s lunqs, or not? And how did she do an autopsy from an island away?