1 posted on
08/31/2014 6:59:51 AM PDT by
Duke C.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: Duke C.
It’s to store Obama’s ego after he leaves the White House.
2 posted on
08/31/2014 7:01:29 AM PDT by
dirtboy
To: Duke C.
“We be going to Mars, again.” - Sheila Jackson Lee (IDIOT-TX)
3 posted on
08/31/2014 7:05:52 AM PDT by
Carriage Hill
( Some days you're the windshield, and some days you're the bug.)
To: Duke C.
4 posted on
08/31/2014 7:13:30 AM PDT by
Dallas59
To: Duke C.
5 posted on
08/31/2014 7:14:52 AM PDT by
WildHighlander57
((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
To: Duke C.
What the heck, why not show it to the world, it’s only national security after all...
6 posted on
08/31/2014 7:20:02 AM PDT by
Caipirabob
(Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
To: Duke C.
Multipurpose. Sometimes you just need a tall hanger with a very tall door.
Where else would you park your dirigible or your tall-tailed whatever to get it out of the hot sun?
7 posted on
08/31/2014 7:21:52 AM PDT by
GBA
(Here in the Matrix, life is but a dream.)
To: Duke C.
“So why would the USAF build a hangar tall enough to house a jumbo jet?”
That size of hanger wouldn’t be unusual at all. What’s unusual is that anyone would think that size is unusual.
8 posted on
08/31/2014 7:24:34 AM PDT by
dynoman
(Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marylin vos Savant)
The FReepathon Is Almost Over!
Click The Pic To Donate
Please Donate!
9 posted on
08/31/2014 7:24:39 AM PDT by
DJ MacWoW
(The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
To: Duke C.
Hey! How about me I was at the ranch.
10 posted on
08/31/2014 7:28:12 AM PDT by
WilliamofCarmichael
(If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
To: Duke C.
One still missing airliner comes to mind.
13 posted on
08/31/2014 7:33:24 AM PDT by
mountainlion
(Live well for those that did not make it back.)
To: Duke C.
So why would the USAF build a hangar tall enough to house a jumbo jet? Uhhhm, because the Air Force wants to hangar a jumbo jet? (SWAG)
15 posted on
08/31/2014 7:34:41 AM PDT by
TADSLOS
(The Event Horizon has come and gone. Buckle up and hang on.)
To: Duke C.
Two things come to mind: airships and ultra-light drone aircraft meant to stay high altitude airborne for years.
The latter have an exceptionally large wingspan.
It should be able to tell if the hangar is for an airship, as they have a rather unique design.
17 posted on
08/31/2014 7:40:55 AM PDT by
yefragetuwrabrumuy
("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
To: Duke C.
So why would the USAF build a hangar tall enough to house a jumbo jet?To perform a stealthy test inflation of the Moochelle balloon before the next Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade?
It's part of the get America skinny thingy.
19 posted on
08/31/2014 7:47:54 AM PDT by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
To: Duke C.
Well they gotta keep it somewhere!
To: Duke C.
For a base that was allegedly deactivated a decade ago it sure looks busy to me.
I just wonder what is being cooked up there.
21 posted on
08/31/2014 7:59:27 AM PDT by
puppypusher
( The World is going to the dogs.)
To: Duke C.
So why would the USAF build a hangar tall enough to house a jumbo jetI'll be the first to admit that I know very little about aviation, but here's a thought: Maybe they plan to put a jumbo jet in there.
To: Duke C.
Location means it is not a hangar. It might be a standoff structure for aircraft that are being staged with armament and shade to keep them out of the sun.
If it was a hangar, it would be offset from the taxiway and runway by about 700ft. It’s location is similar to where one stages an armed aircraft with all the appropriate standoff distances to nearby occupied facilities.
Of course it might also be remotely located so the alien occupants don’t interfere with the mind control technologies of those operating the airfield. <8^0
29 posted on
08/31/2014 8:33:51 AM PDT by
Cvengr
(Adversity in life and death is inevitable. Thru faith in Christ, stress is optional.)
To: Duke C.
Spooky action, at a distance. :)
30 posted on
08/31/2014 8:41:16 AM PDT by
lefty-lie-spy
(Stay metal. For the Horde \m/("_")\m/ - via iPhone from Tokyo.)
To: Duke C.
So why would the USAF build a hangar tall enough to house a jumbo jet? Wasn't a chemically pumped, laser equipped, 747 undergoing development? It was intended to take out ballistic missiles during the boost phase. A smaller, truck mounted version has successfully demonstrated it's capabilities by destroying mortar and artillery shells in flight.
Regards,
GtG
36 posted on
08/31/2014 10:18:28 AM PDT by
Gandalf_The_Gray
(I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
To: Duke C.
Wait until they build the lake.
40 posted on
08/31/2014 11:24:45 AM PDT by
RightGeek
(FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
