Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supremes tell Harrison County & AG to Respond to McDaniel (ORDER IN FAVOR OF MCDANIEL!!!)
http://www.freerepublic.com ^ | July 15,2014 | Unknown

Posted on 07/15/2014 3:03:06 PM PDT by Hostage

The Mississippi Supreme Court ordered the Harrison County Circuit Clerk and Attorney General to respond to Chris McDaniel's petition for a writ of mandamus filed yesterday.

See the link at:

http://kingfish1935.blogspot.com/2014/07/supremes-tell-harrison-county-ag-to.html


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: cochran; mcdaniel; mississippirunoff
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 last
To: SeaHawkFan; Hostage
Sorry, guys, the "Order in Favor of McDaniel" wasn't. The writ was denied. The Mississippi Supreme Court ruled that McDaniel has no right to unredacted poll books; voters' dates of birth and phone numbers must be removed before inspection.
61 posted on 07/17/2014 11:58:10 AM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3181583/posts

As I suggested.


62 posted on 07/17/2014 3:41:55 PM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

Still a win for McDaniel. The stuff that will be redacted is not needed to prove vote fraud.


63 posted on 07/17/2014 6:58:30 PM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan
Still a win for McDaniel. The stuff that will be redacted is not needed to prove vote fraud.

Clearly not needed, which made me wonder why he went to the State Supreme Court (and burned up a chunk of his 12-day time period to challenge the election and of his litigation budget) to pursue it. Because he didn't want to pay the fees for redaction? Because the redaction will take more time? I'm frankly unsure.

64 posted on 07/17/2014 8:24:46 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson