Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Lurking Libertarian

Still a win for McDaniel. The stuff that will be redacted is not needed to prove vote fraud.


63 posted on 07/17/2014 6:58:30 PM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: SeaHawkFan
Still a win for McDaniel. The stuff that will be redacted is not needed to prove vote fraud.

Clearly not needed, which made me wonder why he went to the State Supreme Court (and burned up a chunk of his 12-day time period to challenge the election and of his litigation budget) to pursue it. Because he didn't want to pay the fees for redaction? Because the redaction will take more time? I'm frankly unsure.

64 posted on 07/17/2014 8:24:46 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson