Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: Mexico sees Russian gambit in Ukraine as chance for American land grab
The Daily Caller ^ | 03/23/1014 | Eric Owens

Posted on 03/24/2014 3:37:58 PM PDT by yldstrk

On Friday, in Geneva, Mexico signaled alarm at the treatment of its large Mexican minority in the United States, comparing American actions to prevent the use of Spanish to attempts in Ukraine and Estonia to prevent the use of Russian.

While Mexico’s foreign policy has been generally benign toward the United States since hostilities in the Mexican-American War ended in 1848, the Latin-American country has been keeping a close eye on developing events in Ukraine’s Crimea peninsula.

Russia has maintained that annexation of the Crimea peninsula is justified because it has the right to protect Russian speakers outside of Russia’s borders.

Mexican political leaders have taken note, perhaps sensing an opportunity to gain long-lost territory and increase the size of its economy by expanding northward into areas currently administered by the United States.

Mexico has begun enthusiastically supporting protections for linguistic minorities, a Mexico City diplomat told the United Nations Human Rights Council.

“Language must not be used to segregate and isolate groups,” the diplomat said, according to details provided to The Daily Caller by the U.N. Mexico has officially expressed concern about “steps taken in this regard by belligerent elements in the United States.”

As an example, the Mexico City envoy mentioned a Texas middle school principal’s attempt to ban the use of Spanish in classrooms.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...


TOPICS: Humor; Politics
KEYWORDS: mexico; ukraine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: yldstrk

The Crimean Job


41 posted on 03/24/2014 4:36:21 PM PDT by First_Salute (May God save our democratic-republican government, from a government by judiciary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot; Jim Noble; kabar; Travis McGee
If the democratically elected government of Ukraine could be overthrown and replaced by US/NATO/EU/IMF representatives, how come the reverse isn't true?

That is, how come an anti-US coalition couldn't be formed in Mexico with the help of a Russian centric 'defense' force - similar in construction to NATO - that immediately turned around and signed a treaty with joint military presence comprised of, oh, how about Russian, Chinese & Iranian 'advisers'?

Oh, that's right, something about the Monroe Doctrine. Well, for the numbskulls pushing this strategy in E Europe, guess what? Russia will go to the mat protecting its sphere of influence.

But just because they (at the moment anyway) can't pull this game off in MX doesn't mean they can't roll up Poland, the Baltics, and even some weaker states like Turkey, Greece, etc.

The US/NATO has demonstrated over the last 20 years that it's pretty simple to help overthrow a government - even if you have to bomb them like Serbia. Afterward, all you do then is carve out a partition, recognize the (new) sovereign state/enclave, and and then bring forward the appropriate trade and military base agreements.

We had a great 23 year run while it lasted. The petro-dollar still strong, sufficient conventional fossil fuel resources here & abroad, (semi) cohesive national interest.

Now, all reversed - especially the part about cohesive culture and national interest.

42 posted on 03/24/2014 4:36:28 PM PDT by semantic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

Well when they come out of their holes, it will be a good opportunity to ship them home.


43 posted on 03/24/2014 4:48:08 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

I think this is silly and shouldn’t be in breaking news...


44 posted on 03/24/2014 4:48:30 PM PDT by babygene ( .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: semantic

Mexico’s land grab will come when the treasury has been depleted!


45 posted on 03/24/2014 4:49:43 PM PDT by DocJhn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

And not a shot will be fired.


46 posted on 03/24/2014 4:51:49 PM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wiggen

Where is the Mexican army going to go and beat people up?


Throw rocks


47 posted on 03/24/2014 4:55:54 PM PDT by Linda Frances (Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk
Truthfully this would probably be a good thing..Obama would concede any American rights to any land Mexico tried to grab..but that leaves it also open for Americans in that same area to fight for their own Independent from Obama America

Really if Mexico try to claim Texas..and Obama conceded it..he just legally has given up any US claim on Texas without any Civil War 2...now all Texas would have is a fight with Mexico..piece of cake

48 posted on 03/24/2014 4:57:07 PM PDT by tophat9000 (Are we headed to a Cracker Slacker War?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

They took one look at what’s in the White House and knew that it was now or never.


49 posted on 03/24/2014 5:01:26 PM PDT by Fear The People (When the government fears the people, you have LIBERTY.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk
But remember, Mexico was paid millions in GOLD to give up all rights to the lands north of the Rio Grande. Later the Gadsden Purchase was also paid in GOLD.

Meanwhile, Seward paid RUSSIA millions in GOLD to give up the ALASKA areas.

These nations have NO CLAIM to any of the USA! If MEXICO is worried about their ILLEGAL immigrants in the USA, they should call them home.

50 posted on 03/24/2014 5:03:45 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Sometimes you need 7+ more ammo. LOTS MORE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZLiberty

Riverside County is republican. Mexico can’t have it.


51 posted on 03/24/2014 5:10:54 PM PDT by blueplum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk
Language must not be used to segregate and isolate groups...

Well... how about national borders?

52 posted on 03/24/2014 5:11:36 PM PDT by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wiggen

mexico would deputze the drug lords if they thought they could get territory back.


53 posted on 03/24/2014 5:12:45 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: semantic
Excellent.

And the Russians seem to be a quick study.

54 posted on 03/24/2014 5:13:30 PM PDT by Navy Patriot (Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it, and the Constitution and law mean what WE say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

I agree with you save for the identity of the state. My hunch is Hawaii will be the first to break away.


55 posted on 03/24/2014 5:24:48 PM PDT by MadeInOhio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: wiggen

~difference is Russia can kick ass while the Mexican army is corrupt and incapable of even dealing with drug lords.~

Nope. The difference is that in socioeconomic terms Russia is not Mexico and Ukraine is not USA. In reality it is just opposite.
Military power is nowhere near top as a factor.
Every Ukrainian government since their independence were extremely corrupt, no matter what their geopolitical affiliation was. For that reason Ukraine has light years ahead to catch with Mexico economically and 6 in 10 citizens regardless their ethnicity wouldn’t mind to trade independence for a Russian EBT card.


56 posted on 03/24/2014 5:25:19 PM PDT by wetphoenix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

The article may be satire but the Czechs were not laughing after losing Sudetenland. The fact it was handed to Germany by a flaming progressive elitist may be the element of history that repeats itself.


57 posted on 03/24/2014 5:55:38 PM PDT by trubolotta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

I mentioned immigration & “what would be next”, together, in some comment/question I made on wsj, regarding the world’s willingness to legitimize Russia’s “ethnic identity” defense of its actions in Crimea. No one thought I was serious.


58 posted on 03/24/2014 6:18:02 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

No, San Jacinto 2.0!


59 posted on 03/24/2014 6:31:35 PM PDT by X-spurt (CRUZ missile - armed and ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

More like the 1980s.


60 posted on 03/24/2014 8:13:02 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson