Posted on 03/02/2014 3:59:10 PM PST by Errant
As the book of the Revelation comes to a close, we are left with some very important words. Keep his commandments, know his Torah, and make yourself ready to be the bride of the King. He is coming quickly. Join Michael Rood for the final episode in the series From Here to Eternity – Yeshua’s Famous Last Words: Amen, Emet, Truth.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
I dare you to, in your own words, declare that Jesus is God.
Consider His commandments. Are you sure His word was modified by a handful of bootlickers a coupla thousand years ago? If so, I guess you can call yourself whatever you want. Still, you’ll never make a minyan, and you’ll take His name in vain all your life. It’s a bummer, but it’s a life you’re free to have!
I declared that Yeshua is the same Elohim as Yehova, which trumps your deliberate use of the Rabbinical curse.
slither away Satan.
.
Taking his name in vain requires swearing falsely.
Your lack of understanding of the scriptures is abundant!
.
So how does “Yeshua” sit beside or pray to "Yehova" if they are one and the same?
Not at all. Taking the Lord’s name in vain includes all sorts of actions. Jews know this. It is fascinating stuff - look it up!
“Paul cautioned Timothy to rightly divide the word of truth from the lies of false teachers.”
Exactly. Applies to your comments here fully.
Nothing in Gen. 48:19, nor the rest of Jacob's final words, suggests that "a multitude of nations" must necessarily mean "the dominant population of this world." "Multitude" means "many." It doesn't have to mean "nearly all."
So before you go around calling other people blind, you'd better get your own eyes checked. I think you're hallucinating.
Yehova’s promise to Abraham was that his seed would be “as the sands of the sea.”
Yes, definitely the dominant population of the planet.
He didn’t create this world just to house crud. He created it to house “a people for my name.”
Biblical illiteracy is a real waste of flesh.
.
There will not be so much as one “rightly divider” of his word from itself at the wedding feast. They can’t get in without their ‘garment.’
.
Your method is called eisegesis, while mine is called exegesis.
The difference is you add to his word to make your doctrine, while I seek meaning in the word to find his doctrine.
.
Too bad you don’t seek the meaning from the scriptures, rather than from the very men he condemned when he walked among us.
The scriptures are clear that taking his name in vain is to swear falsely in his name or his temple.
We’ll have to disagree. You mix it all up, emphasizing that written to Israel and imposing on the church that which the a Apostles did not impose.
Still you will live with your choice and I with mine. I don’t hope to change your mind. Legalism always dies a hard death.
I only post to you because young Christians read these threads and I do not want them to be swept into your legalism and to give up the simplicity of the Gospel.
Best
Which you have somehow perverted to mean, "Most of the world will be beach."
He didn’t create this world just to house crud. He created it to house “a people for my name.”
Well, you heard it here first, folks. If you're not a descendent of Abraham after the flesh, you're "crud."
Sounds like just another flavour of master-racist, anti-biblical dog crap to me.
Biblical illiteracy is a real waste of flesh.
Well, then, you and it have something in common. Enjoy! Bye now.
You are completely confused.
Yeshua demanded that we keep the Father’s commandments.
He said that those that love him keep those commandments.
Paul said “not readers of the law, but doers of the law will be justified.” James said the same thing.
What about that do you consider “imposing?”
Yeshua also said that he came only to “the lost sheep of the House of Israel.”
Do you honestly believe that you are not one of those lost sheep?
You desire to send “young christians” into “outer darkness?”
No one that is not either one of “the lost sheep of the House of Israel,” or one of “them that sojourn with her,” will be resurrected in “the first resurrection.” That point is plainly made in the Gospels, and the Epistles.
.
Revelation 22:
[11] He that is unjust, let him be unjust still: and he which is filthy, let him be filthy still: and he that is righteous, let him be righteous still: and he that is holy, let him be holy still.
[12] And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward is with me, to give every man according as his work shall be.
[13] I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last.
[14] Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.
[15] For without are dogs, and sorcerers, and whoremongers, and murderers, and idolaters, and whosoever loveth and maketh a lie.
[16] I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star.
[17] And the Spirit and the bride say, Come. And let him that heareth say, Come. And let him that is athirst come. And whosoever will, let him take the water of life freely.
Those that have disdain for the commandments will be "without."
.
“Do you honestly believe that you are not one of those lost sheep?”
No. I am in the category of “other sheep, not in this flock.”
“Paul said “not readers of the law, but doers of the law will be justified.” James said the same thing.”
If you do not understand the whole book of Romans, it doesn’t help to pick a verse you like. I suggest you make a complete outline of Romans - as I have of every book in the Bible - and you will see that the verse you pick out is in a context that leads to the Gospel and doesn’t stand alone.
Jesus Christ said that those who keep his teaching love Him.
He did not say, “I will only love and give salvation to those who obey first.”
Yea, I saw how you tried to make it say something to support legalism. It doesn’t
Matthew 15:
[24] But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
The "house of Israel" are the ten northern tribes dispersed throughout the world. They are who he came to save. That includes you.
.
“What about that do you consider “imposing?”
In Acts 15, the Council did NOT require gentile converts to keep the Law. The Council did retain the prohibitions on eating blood, meat containing blood, and meat of animals not properly slain, and on fornication and idolatry.
That which the Apostles did not require, and that was never kept by Jews, you want to latch onto Christians and make it a condition of salvation.
It simply is not.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.