Posted on 02/05/2014 4:15:29 AM PST by xzins
Last night, someone emailed and asked me to write about the gay marriage case in Virginia. This morning, a woman from Wisconsin asked if I would blog about the gay marriage case in her state. A few readers in Utah have also requested that I chime in on the gay marriage fight there.
And so I was going to do just that. I sat down to type a scathing rant about gay marriage. I sat down to tell the world that gay marriage is the greatest threat to the sanctity of marriage.
But then I remembered this:
Thats a sign I saw on the side of the road a little while back. Divorce for sale! Only 129 dollars! Get em while theyre hot!
And then I remembered an article I read last week about the new phenomenon of divorce parties. Divorced is the new single, the divorce party planner tells us.
And then I remembered another article claiming that the divorce rate is climbing because the economy is recovering. Now that things are getting a little better, we can finally splurge on that divorce weve always wanted!
And then I remembered that ebbs and flows notwithstanding there is one divorce every 13 seconds, or over 46,000 divorces a week in this country. And then I remembered that, although the 50 percent of marriages end in divorce statistic can be misleading, were still in a situation where there are half as many divorces as there are marriages in a single year.
And then I remembered no-fault divorce. I remembered that marriage is the ONLY LEGAL CONTRACT A PERSON CAN BREAK WITHOUT THE OTHER PARTYS CONSENT AND WITHOUT FACING ANY LEGAL REPERCUSSIONS.
Sorry to scream at you.
But I remembered that marriage has for decades been, from a legal perspective, the least meaningful, least stable, and least protected contract in existence, and I think this fact should be emphasized.
And then I remembered how many Christian churches gave up on marriage long ago, allowing their flock to divorce and remarry and divorce and remarry and divorce and remarry, and each time permitting the charade of vows to take place on their altars. And then I remembered that churches CAN lower the divorce rate simply by taking a consistent position on it which is why practicing Catholics are significantly less likely to break up but many refuse because they are cowards begging for the worlds approval.
And then I remembered that over 40 percent of Americas children are growing up without a father in the home. And then I remembered that close to half of all children will witness the breakdown of their parents marriage. Half of that half will also have the pleasure of watching a second marriage fall apart.
And then I remembered that more and more young people are opting out of marriage because the previous generation was so bad at it that theyve scared their kids away from the institution entirely.
I remembered all of these things, and I decided to instead write about the most urgent threat to the sanctity of marriage.
Divorce.
Divorces are as common as flat tires, and they often happen for reasons nearly as frivolous.
The institution of marriage is crumbling beneath us; its under attack, its mortally wounded, its sprawled out on the pavement with bullet wounds in its back, coughing up blood and gasping for breath. And guess who did this? It wasnt Perez Hilton or Elton John, I can tell you that.
This is the work of divorce.
I am an opponent of gay marriage, but we here in the sanctity of marriage camp are tragically too afraid to approach the thing that is destroying marriage faster than anything else ever could. Gay marriage removes from marriage its procreative characteristic, but rampant divorce takes away its permanent characteristic. It makes no sense to concentrate all of our energy on the former while all but ignoring the latter.
To make matters worse, some of the loudest mouth pieces for traditional marriage in media and politics are bigamists, adulterers, and men with two, three, or four ex-wives. Its not that you cant defend the sanctity of marriage when you have been divorced multiple times, its just that you have zero credibility on the subject.
If you beat and abuse your children so badly that they have to be removed from you, you could, I suppose, still complain if you found out that your kids are also being mistreated in their foster home. But your anger must first be directed at yourself, because it is YOUR FAULT that they are suffering in this way.
So whose fault is it that the institution of marriage is beaten and broken? I dont think we want to contemplate that question, for fear that we might see ourselves in the answer.
Should laws be written to defend marriage? Sure, and lets start with legislation to make divorces at least somewhat harder to obtain than a magazine subscription. How serious are we about this? Anyone up for a law to criminalize adultery? What about putting some restrictions on re-marriage?
There are certainly times when a couple has no choice but to go their separate ways. What else can you do in cases of serial abuse or serial adultery, or when one party simply abandons the other? But infidelity and abuse do not explain the majority of divorces in this country, and they are not the leading causes of break-ups. According to these experts, the top causes of divorce are a lack of individual identity, getting into it for the wrong reasons, and becoming lost in the roles. A survey done by the National Fatherhood Institute found lack of communication, and finances to be the leading culprits. An article in The Examiner also cites finances as the most potent divorce-fuel.
In other words, these days marriages can be blown apart by the slightest gust of wind, coming from any direction, and for any reason. Noticeably absent from all of these polls about the reasons for divorce: gay marriage.
Thats because gay marriage is not the biggest threat to marriage.
We are.
We are, when we vow on our very souls to stand by someone for the rest of our lives, until death do us part, only to let financial troubles and communication difficulties dissolve that union we forged before God. We are, when we forget about those Biblical readings we picked out for our wedding service:
My lover belongs to me and I to him. He says to me: Set me as a seal on your heart, as a seal on your arm; For stern as death is love, relentless as the nether world is devotion; its flames are a blazing fire. Deep waters cannot quench love, nor floods sweep it away.
For stern as death is love.
When we marry, we die. Our old selves die, and we are born anew into each other; into the unbreakable marital bond.
We are a threat to the sanctity of marriage when we let our selfishness fool us into thinking that our wedding vows werent that serious.
Indeed, despite popular sentiment, they were serious. They are serious. Theyre as serious as death.
The struggle to protect marriage is also serious. Its an important battle.
So maybe its time we actually start fighting it.
*NOTE. To answer your questions: no, I have not actually been divorced four times. Ive been married once, and Im still married to her, and Ill never be married to anyone else. The title was tongue-in-cheek. I was writing it from the perspective of the sorts of people who rant about the sanctity of marriage, yet have racked up multiple ex-spouses. Perhaps I should have been more clear about this. In any case, there it is. I appreciate your concern.
Yes, and also the tagline.
Your post deserves a detailed reply but I am very busy for several days. I will try to get back to you.
ha! that’s classic!
That too!
My 17-year-old is nearly as funny as he thinks he is, sometimes.
The left? That's why Oklahoma and Utah and Missisippi and all those leftist states have no-fault divorce?
Let me remind you of a little history: the first no-fault divorce law in America was signed by Gov. Ronald Reagan. The last state to adopt no-fault divorce was New York.
Not to imply that I am in any way better than anyone else, but I am very content to have been married to one woman, and to have been with her for 35 years. I have no interest in making any changes to my relationship with my wife. We’ve had good times, and bad. But, we believe in the vows we made to each other all those many years ago.
Thanks for the comment.
I’m glad that there are those out there who believe in their marriage vows. You clearly are one of them.
Trying to say divorce is a reason to have same sex marriage is a stretch at best.
Then pointing out gay’s will get divorced also (and over time probably statistically catch up) again does nothing to advance the pro-gay argument.
If you have to resort to “well, it won’t be near as bad as marriage now” you’ve probably run out of steam.
Those aren’t “marriages” in the true sense. That sounds more like an addiction to the process.
I think this idea should be examined. To start with, what kind of support does the state, or should the state, give?
Government has proven time and again that it spoils what it touches. Over time and in many places, government has tried to take over religious sacraments, never for the purpose religion assigned them, but for *other* purposes. Births used to be registered in church, now they are registered by the state. Marriage (and divorce) are done by the state. Burial, and now even death, are being encroached upon by the state.
None of them are improved by this.
Alternatively, when marriage, as such, is between people and their faith, it is socially enforced by their community and themselves. An absence of government involvement likely helps far more than it hurts.
I told you some weeks ago I'd get back to you on this. Finally, a thread has been posted that gives some of the rationales why government staying out of marriage entirely would not work:
I’m sorry to hear that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.