Posted on 01/31/2014 12:41:17 PM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
Ill concede here at the beginning that Ive never worked on a political campaign. Nor do I have any experience in media relations, publicity, political communication or whatever else flacks do. I dont know the nuances of trying to defuse controversy with a speech. But I have covered many political campaigns in Texas the past decade, so I know what it looks like when a campaign handles the press well.
And the Wendy Davis operation is about the worst at media relations that Ive ever seen. Her teams mismanagement of the press is damaging her candidacy.
The foul-ups began as soon as Davis entered the race, and hired a young and relatively inexperienced communications team that had spent little to no time working as reporters. At first, the mistakes were minor, even funny. For instance, Davis press staff directed a Texas Tribune reporter to the wrong place for an event and gave a Texas Observer reporter the wrong address to their own campaign headquarters. Im sure that was annoying for the misdirected reporters, but nothing that would affect the campaign.
As the weeks went by, though, Davis team often treated the press with suspicion, asking repeatedly what a story would say before granting access to staffers, refusing to confirm basic campaign scheduling details and shielding Davis from in-person interviews with some major outlets.
That wont win you any friends in the press and wont earn much favorable coverage. Still, these are the kind of errors that only journalists care about, the stuff of endless reporter gripe sessions.
In November, when Davis swung through the Rio Grande Valley, the mishandling of the press started to become a real liability. The campaign invited reporters to attend volunteer phone-banks. Thats not the most compelling political theater, but reporters in the Valley showed up for a rare chance to query Davis in person. At the event in McAllen, as the Monitors Sandra Sanchez would later report in a piece titled Wendy Davis Is Not Ready for Prime Time:
It was embarrassing to watch as a campaign staffer prematurely announced Davis arrival and urged everyone to stand up and chant, which they did for several minutes until it was obvious that Davis wasnt there. I thought she was here, a worker mused into the microphone to the quizzical and confused glances from the crowd of 60 or so.
When Davis did arrive, she met with reporters for 10 minutes. Sanchez asked the candidate about her statement, at an earlier event in the Valley, that Davis was pro-life. This was a predictable question given the campaigns reluctance to even say the word abortion. Sanchez documents what happened next: [Davis] looked at me and shook her head. But before she could articulate, her new press aide Rebecca Acuña jumped in and said that comment was taken out of context.
You almost never see a flack jump in front of their boss like that. Makes the politician look weak. Acuña then called Sanchez later that night and asked her to change a headline on the Monitors website.
We might blame these screw-ups on the follies common to a recently formed campaign. But its gotten only worse.
In the past two weeks, the campaigns response to the controversy over the details of Davis bio (aka, Trailer-gate) has been slow and weak. On Tuesday nighta mere 11 days after The Dallas Morning News story that raised questions about her bio was publishedDavis gave what her campaign termed a major speech to set the record straight at a fundraiser in Austin.
That quoteset the record straightcomes from the media advisory about the speech the Davis campaign distributed on Tuesday afternoon. A media advisory is like an invitation. By sending one out, youre inviting (or in some cases begging) the press to cover your event.
But when reporters arrived at the Four Seasons ballroom, they were turned away. As The Dallas Morning News Wayne Slater and the San Antonio Express-News David Saleh Rauf reported, event organizers said the room was too full and there wasnt space for the press. Why wouldnt they make room for media at an event that featured Cecile Richards, head of Planned Parenthood, and Davis response to a controversy attracting national media attention?
Of course, there was room for some mediaThe Texas Tribune was allowed in to livestream and cover the speech. That, according to a well-reported piece by the Statesmans Jonathan Tilove, was the result of intrepid work by Tribune reporter Jay Root. Good on him for getting a scoop. But that doesnt explain why the campaign and event organizers would grant exclusive access to a major campaign speech to one media outlet.
It turned out the Davis campaigns media advisory actually stated that the event was closed to the press but helpfully provided the link to the Tribs livestream. This is not unlike someone sending you an invitation that says youre not invited to a party, but, hey, you can watch it on Skype.
If you would find that offensive, then you can understand why some reporters, Rauf especially, were angry and have been ripping the Davis campaign and the Democratic Party this week on Twitter.
While its not smart to enrage most of the Capitol press corps, theres a bigger issue. The Davis campaign almost certainly robbed the speech of wider media exposure by barring TV stations and major daily newspaper reporters.
Then theres the questionable decision to hold Davis big set the record straight speech, after not responding very forcefully for 11 days, the same night as the State of the Union.
Thats all too bad, because Davis gave a great speech. It was heartfelt and impassioned. You can watch it on YouTube. Its been viewed 801 times.
The gubernatorial campaign has just started, of course, and theres plenty of time for the Davis staffers to become more media savvy. But so far their handling of the press is doing a disservice to their candidate. Tags: Governor 2014, Wendy Davis
They can't fix stupid.
Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!
Wish I could be a fly on the wall wherever Wendy is being discussed by rat strategists. I suspect the party insider types (eg. klintoon, beckel, carville) would like to dump her ASAP. Problem is the insane rat base love her.
She’s sort of like the rat version of Todd Aikman, except that no one ever really loved Aikman.
hee hee hee What can they do? She is a liar, has no mother instinct and is a terrible candidate. Nothing the campaign can fix.
She needs to get that mole on her face looked at.
Thats all too bad, because Davis gave a great speech. It was heartfelt and impassioned. You can watch it on YouTube. Its been viewed 801 times.
801 times :)
So lots of blonde hair and robust ta-tas ain’t gonna make it happen?
Looks like she’s about as comfortable with that shotgun as she is being a mother.
Personal Webcams of going to the toilet get bigger hits.
Abortion is all that Barbie’s got.
Yet, she still has a good chance of winning.
Everybody’s missing the point of this article. The reason stuff like this happens is the press has given staff’s like Davis’ the impression the press works for them for too long.
Texas Ping.
Trying to save herself by out Palining Palin.
Not even in the Valley.
Not giving her number 802.
So, is she pro-life or pro-death?
Are Texas journalists similar to journalists around the country? Meaning, after all this bitching will they vote for her anyway?
Wendy Davis Campaign Just Started a War with the TX Press Corps (Update: TX Media Explode in Rage)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3117721/posts
A pretty face does not translate into brain cells
Just think Mary Landrieu
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.