Posted on 01/26/2014 4:13:05 PM PST by lbryce
Notice the term is phrased as temperature "anomaly", for one. Also it depends on where you take the measurements from. If you take measurements from cities you will see higher temps. If you take measurements from rural areas you will actually see a cooling trend. This is why they backed off from "global warming" and changed it to "global climate change.
Yeah and they all use the same temperature monitoring stations. Ya know the ones positioned on building roofs and concrete parking lots.
A half a degree?
They want to destroy business for a half a degree?
Where is the information on Sun activity at the same time? Oh, they aren't considering that?
A half degree Celcius.
Which is like....millions of degrees Fahrenheit
I have serious doubts that any data taken from different places all over the world would look like an exact copy of one another.
But I sure don't see the affects of Global Warming here in S.E. Louisiana.
No, a *change* of 1 degree C is 9/5 = 1.8 degree F.
When was the Environmental Protection Agency started? Is that when the temperature started climbing?
Your Celcious to Farehnheit converter must have been made in China.
I got it from an ad on Current TV.
The Algore special. I’m serial!
The earth is 4.5 million years old and I should panic because of a chart of the last 130 years.
1 degree C = 1.8 F...that’s the approximate ratio of miles to kilometres.....is there a correlation escaping my pea brain ? Degrees celsius are larger than our degrees whereas Kilos are smaller than miles, but the ratio interests me.
but only if the thermometer has a 100 watt light bulb shining directly on it
No, a *change* of 1 degree C is 9/5 = 1.8 MILLION degrees F.
it is climate change here people get it rite
All four of these “agencies” are probably dependent upon government dollars to buy their temperature gauges. I’m sorry, any time government dollars are involved, I’m going to be skeptical. The government doesn’t hand out money to people who go against that government’s agenda.
Fer shure, fer shure!
I’ll go up, have a look-see, and come back to tellem that there is no FRicking Global Warming!
It is a figment of thier political funding imagination!
What a bunch of maroons!
NASA shouldn’t be “studying” anything of this kind anyway, but the handful of agitprop generators behind the four “studies” aren’t scientists, whatever their paperwork states.
Ya know the ones positioned on building roofs and concrete parking lots.
Not to mention next to the outdoor components of HVAC systems.
I think this chart is faked. They’re all using the same data, just different versions of it (different interpretations of proxy data).
Remember Michael Mann’s “nature trick” where he grafted proxy data onto temperature measurements?
This destroys all confidence that NASA is scientifically competent. They put their reputation on the line with this chart.
And the way it’s worded has the nasty feline touch of the progressive Democrat.
So its all political science from now on from NASA.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.