Skip to comments.
Connecticut...refusing to register their “assault weapons” and “high capacity” magazines
Bearing Arms ^
| January 23, 2014
| Bob Owens
Posted on 01/24/2014 4:52:29 PM PST by Mechanicos
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
"Historically speaking, 90-percent or more of those required to comply with gun registration laws in the U.S. refuse to do so,..."
To: Mechanicos
Sounds a lot like the compliance in NY.
2
posted on
01/24/2014 4:53:49 PM PST
by
Dutch Boy
To: Mechanicos
3
posted on
01/24/2014 4:55:28 PM PST
by
Paladin2
To: Mechanicos
>> 90-percent or more of those required to comply with gun registration laws in the U.S. refuse to do so
Now THAT’S interesting!
Sets up a number of possible scenarios... will they go door-to-door? Will they (illegally) use the BATF “registry” that isn’t supposed to exist? Will they do nothing and undermine their own rule of law?
Popcorn anyone? Do you take butter and salt?
4
posted on
01/24/2014 4:56:08 PM PST
by
Nervous Tick
(Without GOD, men get what they deserve.)
To: Mechanicos
That's a lotta boating accidents in Barkhamsted Reservoir, gee a lotta somebodies need the Coast Guard Basic Boating Course :-)...
5
posted on
01/24/2014 4:56:20 PM PST
by
taildragger
(The E-GOP won't know what hit them, The Party of Reagan is almost here, hang tight folks....)
To: Mechanicos
6
posted on
01/24/2014 4:57:07 PM PST
by
Caipirabob
(Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
To: Mechanicos
Oh yeah, self banned...
7
posted on
01/24/2014 4:58:58 PM PST
by
Caipirabob
(Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
To: Dutch Boy
8
posted on
01/24/2014 4:59:40 PM PST
by
ChildOfThe60s
((If you can remember the 60s.....you weren't really there)
To: Mechanicos
Someday, someone will realize the cannot make a law against a constitutional right.
Someday that same egg sucking politician might realize that concept will only buy a limited number of votes.
9
posted on
01/24/2014 5:01:14 PM PST
by
hadaclueonce
(Because Brawndo's got electrolytes. Because Ethanol has Big Corn Lobby)
To: Mechanicos
10
posted on
01/24/2014 5:02:38 PM PST
by
JoeProBono
(SOME IMAGES MAY BE DISTURBING VIEWER DISCRETION IS ADVISED;-{)
To: Mechanicos
I went to CT today. I was going to buy some ammo and other stuff. The poor guy in front of me practically had to give a blood sample to buy his ammo. I put mine back.
Never thought it would be easier to buy ammo in MASS.
11
posted on
01/24/2014 5:02:40 PM PST
by
Vermont Lt
(If you want to keep your dignity, you can keep it. Period........ Just kidding, you can't keep it.)
To: JoeProBono
Good job.
That's a keeper.
12
posted on
01/24/2014 5:05:00 PM PST
by
Paladin2
To: Vermont Lt
13
posted on
01/24/2014 5:05:50 PM PST
by
Paladin2
To: Vermont Lt
So move to Texas. We need more like you, Sir!
It’s not *quite* so cold here, either. :-)
14
posted on
01/24/2014 5:07:09 PM PST
by
Nervous Tick
(Without GOD, men get what they deserve.)
To: Mechanicos
There are too many people for this lawless government to corral with their unconstitutional dictates.
Just pretend they don’t exist....and they don’t. LOL
15
posted on
01/24/2014 5:07:14 PM PST
by
dforest
To: Mechanicos
Pleasantly surprised that there are people in Ct. who have the balls to ignore “the man”.
16
posted on
01/24/2014 5:09:57 PM PST
by
RetiredTexasVet
(It's difficult to differentiate between a hog calling contest and a Senate rollcall.)
To: Dutch Boy
I am in NY and I can assure you nobody is registering unless they are high profile personalities like radio tv or politics
17
posted on
01/24/2014 5:21:42 PM PST
by
Ouderkirk
(To the left, everything must evidence that this or that strand of leftist theory is true)
To: Mechanicos
90% ignoring an unconstitutional law? Nice!
That’s about the same as the percentage of the uninsured who are ignoring the unconstitutional ObamaCare law.
It looks to me like the far left has overreached in many respects, and their government has lost what little residual legitimacy it inherited from past generations. FedGov has no expectation of legitimacy and each command they issue is appropriately being evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
18
posted on
01/24/2014 5:21:50 PM PST
by
Pollster1
("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
To: Mechanicos
A few of these “lawmakers” need to start vanishing, along with their “enforcers”.
19
posted on
01/24/2014 5:24:05 PM PST
by
Lurker
(Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
To: Mechanicos
The Gov. and the state of Connecticut do not have the consent of the people. The Gov. and the state of Connecticut are in for a rough patch.
Neither will figure out why.
20
posted on
01/24/2014 5:28:05 PM PST
by
YHAOS
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson