"Historically speaking, 90-percent or more of those required to comply with gun registration laws in the U.S. refuse to do so,..."
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: Mechanicos
Sounds a lot like the compliance in NY.
2 posted on
01/24/2014 4:53:49 PM PST by
Dutch Boy
To: Mechanicos
3 posted on
01/24/2014 4:55:28 PM PST by
Paladin2
To: Mechanicos
>> 90-percent or more of those required to comply with gun registration laws in the U.S. refuse to do so
Now THAT’S interesting!
Sets up a number of possible scenarios... will they go door-to-door? Will they (illegally) use the BATF “registry” that isn’t supposed to exist? Will they do nothing and undermine their own rule of law?
Popcorn anyone? Do you take butter and salt?
4 posted on
01/24/2014 4:56:08 PM PST by
Nervous Tick
(Without GOD, men get what they deserve.)
To: Mechanicos
That's a lotta boating accidents in Barkhamsted Reservoir, gee a lotta somebodies need the Coast Guard Basic Boating Course :-)...
5 posted on
01/24/2014 4:56:20 PM PST by
taildragger
(The E-GOP won't know what hit them, The Party of Reagan is almost here, hang tight folks....)
To: Mechanicos
6 posted on
01/24/2014 4:57:07 PM PST by
Caipirabob
(Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
To: Mechanicos
Oh yeah, self banned...
7 posted on
01/24/2014 4:58:58 PM PST by
Caipirabob
(Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
To: Mechanicos
Someday, someone will realize the cannot make a law against a constitutional right.
Someday that same egg sucking politician might realize that concept will only buy a limited number of votes.
9 posted on
01/24/2014 5:01:14 PM PST by
hadaclueonce
(Because Brawndo's got electrolytes. Because Ethanol has Big Corn Lobby)
To: Mechanicos
10 posted on
01/24/2014 5:02:38 PM PST by
JoeProBono
(SOME IMAGES MAY BE DISTURBING VIEWER DISCRETION IS ADVISED;-{)
To: Mechanicos
I went to CT today. I was going to buy some ammo and other stuff. The poor guy in front of me practically had to give a blood sample to buy his ammo. I put mine back.
Never thought it would be easier to buy ammo in MASS.
11 posted on
01/24/2014 5:02:40 PM PST by
Vermont Lt
(If you want to keep your dignity, you can keep it. Period........ Just kidding, you can't keep it.)
To: Mechanicos
There are too many people for this lawless government to corral with their unconstitutional dictates.
Just pretend they don’t exist....and they don’t. LOL
15 posted on
01/24/2014 5:07:14 PM PST by
dforest
To: Mechanicos
Pleasantly surprised that there are people in Ct. who have the balls to ignore “the man”.
16 posted on
01/24/2014 5:09:57 PM PST by
RetiredTexasVet
(It's difficult to differentiate between a hog calling contest and a Senate rollcall.)
To: Mechanicos
90% ignoring an unconstitutional law? Nice!
That’s about the same as the percentage of the uninsured who are ignoring the unconstitutional ObamaCare law.
It looks to me like the far left has overreached in many respects, and their government has lost what little residual legitimacy it inherited from past generations. FedGov has no expectation of legitimacy and each command they issue is appropriately being evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
18 posted on
01/24/2014 5:21:50 PM PST by
Pollster1
("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
To: Mechanicos
A few of these “lawmakers” need to start vanishing, along with their “enforcers”.
19 posted on
01/24/2014 5:24:05 PM PST by
Lurker
(Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
To: Mechanicos
The Gov. and the state of Connecticut do not have the consent of the people. The Gov. and the state of Connecticut are in for a rough patch.
Neither will figure out why.
20 posted on
01/24/2014 5:28:05 PM PST by
YHAOS
To: Mechanicos
Compliance with Tyranny is Treason...
21 posted on
01/24/2014 5:30:47 PM PST by
Kickass Conservative
(Nobody owes you a living, so shut up and get back to work...)
To: Mechanicos
Silly right wingers. Don't they know that civil disobedience is only for leftists.
22 posted on
01/24/2014 5:31:53 PM PST by
CrazyIvan
(Obama phones= Bread and circuits.)
To: Mechanicos
What if they had a law and nobody came (we are the revolutionaries now)
23 posted on
01/24/2014 5:32:59 PM PST by
bigbob
(The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
To: Mechanicos
let them try boston-style tactics, they will likely get a sore response.
glad so many didn’t register. this law is unconstitutional.
24 posted on
01/24/2014 5:34:17 PM PST by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: Mechanicos
Historically speaking, 90-percent or more of those required to comply with gun registration laws in the U.S. refuse to do so, and there is no reason to suspect that this registration attempt in Connecticut is any different. Ive seen estimates of 1,000,000 firearm magazines that should have been registered under the law, but the state reports registering only 40,000
just 4 percent.
Excellent.
25 posted on
01/24/2014 5:38:37 PM PST by
cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
To: Mechanicos
Good on ya Connecticut gun owners...a lesson for others.
26 posted on
01/24/2014 5:41:06 PM PST by
SZonian
(Throwing our allegiances to political parties in the long run gave away our liberty.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson