I am not distorting anything - your analogy conflates and disfigures and loses all sense of proportionality and is just almost worthless……
Simpson is not guilty in the eyes of the law, but Winston is not even chargeable in the eyes of the law. Now there is a chance that they are equally guilty, but while we have every reason to believe Simpson is guilty, we have almost as much reason to believe Winston is not. Do you even know what is known about the accuser? No, you don’t.
And again, you also conflated the argument about Winston recusing himself and the DA and the issue of legal guilt. You just keep mixing and matching in a totally illogical mess of an attempt to vent your self righteousness about an issue you are ignorant of.
No, total ignorance would imply I was unaware the credibility and prestige of the Heisman Trophy would be undermined by this in many people's eyes. Of that I'm quite certain.