To: 2ndDivisionVet
I thought there was a “hot” problem....and lifting the hood alone was dangerous. Read that a long time ago???
To: Sacajaweau
I’m guessing that’s what has taken so long to work on.
5 posted on
12/11/2013 3:53:38 AM PST by
2ndDivisionVet
("Of the 4 wars in my lifetime none came about because the US was too strong." Reagan)
To: Sacajaweau
There’s two problems, or three really — hydrogen storage doesn’t yield good density, liquid fuels are always more compact; there is no hydrogen distribution network and it will cost a fortune to build one; and hydrogen has to be made and stored, and SOLD, all of which will require MORE production of electricity while Clinton and Obama have both fought against coal mining, a fight they have been doing on behalf of their OPEC masters.
10 posted on
12/11/2013 4:07:03 AM PST by
SunkenCiv
(http://www.freerepublic.com/~mestamachine/)
To: Sacajaweau
A hydrogen fuel cell car or a ICE engine that runs off of Hydrogen can be made safe so as long as there are safe guards put in the place and it's handled correctly.
If you go to YOUTUBE there are tests videos of auto crashes of cars fueled by gasoline, liquid petronium, and hydrogen.
Yes hydrogen is explosive but it has the fastest rate of dissipation than all the other fuels.
In other words once the tank is breached it goes up into the air and is safely away from the automobile.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson