Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Sacajaweau

There’s two problems, or three really — hydrogen storage doesn’t yield good density, liquid fuels are always more compact; there is no hydrogen distribution network and it will cost a fortune to build one; and hydrogen has to be made and stored, and SOLD, all of which will require MORE production of electricity while Clinton and Obama have both fought against coal mining, a fight they have been doing on behalf of their OPEC masters.


10 posted on 12/11/2013 4:07:03 AM PST by SunkenCiv (http://www.freerepublic.com/~mestamachine/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv

I know some companies were looking at using gasoline as the fuel source. A reformer heated the gas and extracted the hydrogen for the fuel cell.

Fuel cells are generally twice as efficient as combustion engines so not only was it cleaner but you get more mph.

Also it solves the infrastructure problem.

Hopefully this works.


32 posted on 12/11/2013 7:58:50 AM PST by crusher2013
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson