Posted on 08/07/2013 6:29:11 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
The following image is a composite created by scanning the WH LFBC using Xerox WorkCentre 7655 upside down using the automatic feeder. The resulting file was opened in Preview, the image rotated 180 degrees and printed to PDF. The resulting PDF was opened in preview, the layers unlocked and moved to the side. In addition, a close up of the signature was ‘blown up’ to show how the background layer, not surprisingly, has filled in some of the white that resulted from the separation of the background and foreground layers.
Note how for example the signature block is fully separated.
(Excerpt) Read more at nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com ...
No link to the claimed replicated pdf it available, yet, that I can see, but Fogblowers and Dr. Conspiracy and their ilk are ecstatic!
**INCOMING** ping...
NBC’s supporting blogpost from Aug 5, 2013:
“WH 7655 Experiments”
http://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/2013/08/05/wh-7655-experiments/
I am getting closer to having all the necessary data and images to make my case. Since it makes sense to do a final confirmation of one’s hypotheses, I decided to print out a better version of the WH LFBC (with halos) and have them run through a Xerox WorkCentre 7655 Scanner.
I performed three successive scans, once with the document the righ-side-up, once with the document upside-down USD. The USD versions were rotated 180 degrees and printed using Preview (USDRotPrev).
The Mixed Raster Compression is not perfect but it consistently recognizes the signature block, the date stamp (2011) and the mostly text. All jpg files contain the ‘YCbCr’ comment tag.
And we know that the White Hut uses this particular machine?
IIRC, a MAC at the WH had the document immediately before the upload. The scan (if genuine) could have been sent to the WH MAC from anywhere!
I have a vague memory of a claim that the WH has this Xerox. It is a pretty high-end unit of the sort one might expect to be at the WH.
That’s been my question. How do these guys know this? Would indicate a connection. Given that they have been spouting disinfo, diversion, and ridicule for years any connection would make them official liars for Obama, ie conspirators.
“The image separates into one color background layer and multiple monochrome layers.” - at source
This completely disqualifies this process for creating what was posted on WH.gov.
There where multiple shades of dark green text used on the WHLFCOLB.pdf document. (not to mention all the other alignment and typeface problems.)
All of this assumes there was a paper original. One has not been seen.
Posted on June 24, 2013 by NBC
“The Proof – Forgery done by Xerox Workcentre 7655”
http://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/2013/06/24/the-proof-forgery-done-by-xerox-workcentre-7655/
“I printed out the Whitehouse PDF and scanned it back in. While the color was strangely blueish, there were some interesting components when looking at the layers. First of all there were only 5 layers.
“The scan is rotated clock-wise but I bet I can change that depending on the orientation of the input. Needless to say, we see all the identifying markers. Incomplete separation of the information into the background and foreground, multiple foreground layers. It’s not perfect but it’s good enough to be able to reject most of the Cold Case Posse’s findings.”
(images of claimed resulting JPEG layers with separation of signature and date blocks...)
Note that the claimed replicated layers at this link (same as the top of the thread)...
http://nativeborncitizen.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/wh7655usdrotprevv1_v2-pdf.png
...show the split of the “Stanley Ann D” signature portion in one layer and the rest of the signature in another layers.
Except by Dr. Chiyome Fukino, former director of the Hawaii Department of Health, Dr. Alvin T. Onaka, Hawaii state Registrar, Loretta Fuddy, current director of the Hawaii Department of Health and whoever the staff person was who made the photocopies for Obama’s attorney, Judith Corley to take back to D.C.
Former Governor Lingle:
“You know, during the campaign of 2008, I was actually in the mainland campaigning for Senator McCain. This issue kept coming up so much in the campaign, and again I think it’s one of those issues that is simply a distraction from the more critical issues that are facing the country. And so I had my health director, who is a physician by background, go personally view the birth certificate in the birth records of the Department of Health, and we issued a news release at that time saying that the president was, in fact, born at Kapi’olani Hospital in Honolulu, Hawaii. And that’s just a fact. And yet people continue to call up and e-mail and want to make it an issue. And I think it’s, again, a horrible distraction for the country by those people who continue this. It’s been established. He was born here.”—May 4, 2010
“On April 22, 2011, President Obama sent a letter to Director Fuddy, requesting two certified copies of his original Certificate of Live Birth. Also on that day, Judith Corley, the President’s personal attorney, made the same request in writing on behalf of the President.
On April 25, 2011, pursuant to President Obama’s request, Director Fuddy personally witnessed the copying of the original Certificate of Live Birth and attested to the authenticity of the two copies. Dr. Alvin Onaka, the State Registrar, certified the copies.
President Obama authorized Ms. Corley to pick up the documents. On April 25, 2011, Ms. Corley appeared in person at the Hawai„i State Department of Health building in Honolulu, paid the requisite fee, and was given the two certified copies, a response letter from Director Fuddy to President Obama, and a receipt for payment.”
Apparently these guys had a pristine original to work with.
They're claiming to have gotten exactly the same results by using the same starting conditions and equipment...
Per GregNH:
“All of this assumes there was a paper original. One has not been seen.”
Per NBC:
“I printed out the Whitehouse PDF and scanned it back in.”
NBC claims to have simply printed out a color copy of the WH pdf and then scanned it back into the Xerox 7655. If this is true then there COULD have been a hard copy original...which itself could have been a forgery for numerous suspected reasons unrelated to the layers and floating Onaka and date blocks.
Obots have always claimed that “birthers” would claim that the hard copy supposedly brought back to the WH was a forgery, if it was ever proved that the pdf layers could be replicated. Given the mysterious failure to find the original for years in the HI vault, even by the current governor, forgery is still obviously a possibility.
Reed Hayes 40-page report to Zullo affirming forgery could well have little to do with the pdf layers and may be based on other anomalies.
“And I think it’s, again, a horrible distraction for the country by those people who continue this.”
Um...that would be POTUS Barry who has refused to sign a legal release for Onaka to legally release a certified hard copy and produce that certified copy into ANY court proceeding despite over 100 opportunities to do so!
Are you really that naive? Two copies? Why have we only seen one image?
Thanks, Seizethecarp.
Which invalidates any "analysis" of the haloing since the printed copy of the WH PDF already has the haloing in it.
Did the CCP release the 40-page report while I wasn't looking?
Color me unimpressed.
“Did the CCP release the 40-page report while I wasn’t looking?”
Not to my knowledge.
Zullo’s criminal report is supposedly over 300 pages, only a portion of which takes apart the pdf, and it is not clear to what extent Reed Hayes 40-page document examination report relies on the pdf layers as a basis for his declaration that the WH pdf BC image is a forgery. Hayes is not a computer imaging expert in his CV. Hayes’ report could well rely on many other deficiencies in the image unrelated to the pdf layers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
