Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: BigGuy22

” it would have been natural in 1961 for a Kenyan to denote his race as “African.”

I can understand this part of it, but I don’t see why an American Nurse/Doctor would fill out the cert with a term not used on US certs. The form says “race”not “Nationality.” He was obviously a Negro, and that’s the standard term that we used back then. Why would they break from the US standard? Oh well,,,,,


44 posted on 07/19/2013 2:17:41 PM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra

“I don’t see why an American Nurse/Doctor would fill out the cert with a term not used on US certs”
__

I think that part has been explained several times. It was the practice to use the same term the father used. It was not the province of nurses or doctors to change the father’s description to conform to their own ideas of correct usage or anything else. Their job was simply to ask the parents to state their own race and to write down what they said.


45 posted on 07/19/2013 2:25:14 PM PDT by BigGuy22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra

Im my opinion the “Africa” issue is unverifiable and cannot be used as a significant factor in declaring the BC to be a forgery.


46 posted on 07/19/2013 2:29:51 PM PDT by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson