Posted on 06/01/2013 10:34:19 AM PDT by Cold Case Posse Supporter
Maricopa County Sheriffs Office Cold Case Posse chief investigator Mike Zullo this morning addressed the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association Convention (CSPOA) being held in St. Charles, Missouri. Much of the information that was revealed by Zullo we have already heard but he also unveiled new evidence that we have not been aware of. Commander Mike Zullo appears in the video at the 36:00 mark. The audio and video from the streaming isn't that good but pay attention very closely.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
I hoped that would be the case Snoringbear. Most citizens don't pay attention, or can be swayed because they don't have the knowledge to question assertions by those who have assumed authority. An Army Surgeon, Dr. Lakin, who was an officer, Colonel or Lt. Colonel, and had served three previous assignments in the Middle East, questioned Obama’s eligibility to issue his, Dr. Lakin’s, next assignment to wars in the middle east. He made it clear that he intended, and wanted to care for soldiers, but Officers swear an oath to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution, not the president. Dr. Lakin asked the military court to affirm that he was not violating his oath since there was not evidence that Obama was legitimate. (Congress had not vetted Obama, nor asked any of the pertinent constitutional questions.)
The military Court, in a nutshell, would not permit Dr. Lakin to present evidence, wouldn't allow him witnesses, and declared that the assignment and orders descended from bureaucrats and not the Commander in Chief. The Military has been corrupted by the purging of senior officers, constitutional originalists, and their replacement by academics and lackeys like former Sec. of Defense, Robert Gates, who testified that the Muslim Brotherhood had forsaken violence and was a benign religious/cultural organization.
I do not disagree with you Tuketu, but for majority who have not carefully read the Constitution, the Constitution left the definition of who were citizens to Congress, Article 1 Section 8, “An Uniform Rule for naturalization”. The Constitution only specified one class of citizen, a natural born citizen, because they considered the requirements for that office too critical to be left for Congress; no framer disagreed. The Constitution didn't include definitions of terms in the document, since our Constitution was built upon what was known then as “natural law”, or “The Law of Nations”. That was “common law”. These were terms familiar to most everyone, as indicated by the lack of any argument after John Jay reminded Washington to require natural born citizen as a presidential requirement.
There are two classes of citizens of the US, natural born, and naturalized. Naturalized citizens were defined by Congress. Natural born citizens were so defined by God, or nature. Barack Obama told us honestly that he was born a British subject, and became a naturalized citizen based upon the 14th Amendment. His language, on his own web site, fightthesmears.com, used the obscure term "native-born citizen of the US", which comes from the 14th Amendment, which nowhere mentions natural born citizenship. "Native-born" refers to those born on our soil. The 14th Amendment didn't even make all of those "native-born" into citizens. American Indians, certainly native-born, were not made citiens. But former slaves were, and that was the motivation for finally creating "An Uniform Rule for Naturalization". Obama, presumably born in Hawaii, is a naturalized citizen, and he said exactly that.
There has been complicity by both political parties to avoid any legal discussion of the issue. No eligibility case has been allowed to reach discovery. Such is the depth of corruption. Even with dozens of failed attempts to amend Article II Section 1, no congress has passed out an amendment for a 3/4 vote by the states. Seven amendment attempts alone between 2000 and 2007.
Why were Republicans silent? Because McCain had been shown in hearing after hearing, mostly instigated by Democrats, to be ineligible. We are burying the Constitution, but it is still useful to acknowledge the wisdom of our framers and founders. Natural born citizens are citizens, as Chief Justice Waite noted in Minor v. Happersett, but citizens are not necessarily natural born citizens. Otherwise every anchor baby would be eligible to the presidency, and the child born in a colony or state of royalists, residents of the Colonies who retained allegiance to the Crown after 1776, would have been eligible to the presidency. Our founders who had seen their relatives and friends massacred by the British would not have been so foolish, and weren't.
I’m not sure if anyone posted this yet, but the morning session that was video taped was basically information most of us know already, the afternoon session is private and that is where Lt. Zullo will provide new details. We are waiting to hear how that session went.
http://ppsimmons.blogspot.com is supposed to have updates after the afternoon session is over, but they haven’t posted yet.
“If proven that O does not have a United States Birth Certificate, as US Citizenship is required for the Pres. IMHO all appointments and laws signed (O-care) are sic INVALID.”
Wish that were true, but regardless of the circumstance of how the President Elect reaches the point where he is given the Oath of Office (swearing in), once he is sworn in he is the legal President. The only way to terminate prior to completing the 4 year term is by resigning, expiring or impeachment.
some of the secret stuff forces decision makers to come forward.............all I’m sayin and smile...we are bein watched and read.....drone attacks in 5 4 3 2 ...
I was a little surprised by what Zullo said - they used the 1960 manual. I should NOT have been surprised, LOL, because it does make sense. The manual in use at the time obama was born would indeed have been the 1960 - any changes to that one would have resulted in the one that I posted. Otherwise it (the 1961 dated manual) would not have been re-issued as a “revised”. I haven’t looked over the 1960 manual to compare between the two.
I kind of assumed that it would be more in the geographical section that any revisions were made. I need to look it over, don’t I?
It sounds to me like what he is saying is that the Hawaii DOH would see a birth certificate that said “African” and then send it back to the hospital to have them change it to “Negro”. And he has examples, but were those parents born in the US?
And why would the NIHS need to tell their coders how to code the parents’ race, if all the DOHs were correcting the BCs to match the Federal tables? We know that Hawaii had their own set of codes, right? How would that figure into it?
“”””...... but regardless of the circumstance of how the President Elect reaches the point where he is given the Oath of Office (swearing in), once he is sworn in he is the legal President. The only way to terminate prior to completing the 4 year term is by resigning, expiring or impeachment.......”””””
REALLY? Are you an attorney? Makes no sense to me. EXAMPLE.... Let us say a person does not have a medical degree but manages to take the Hippocratic Oath (swearing in) and opens a medical practice. In doing so, many people are fooled and even call him Doctor. Does his illigal usurption become moot? Answer Please
Not true X-spurt. We have had at least three Congressmen, all senators I believe, removed from office after it was discovered that they didn’t satisfy one of age or residency, or citizenship requirements. Their congressional histories were simply erased. Impeachment is irrelevant if the subject is not legally elected. The subject is an ordinary, in this case naturalized, citizen, with all the privileges and protections of a natural born citizen, except that he is ineligible for the presidency.,p> Obama has broken a number of laws, including fund solicitation as an ineligible candidate. There is lots to prosecute, but his powers and reshaping of government agencies will protect him. Beides Eric Holder, he has installed a Wahhabi Muslim as CIA director, and has dedicated operatives throughout the IRS, DHS, and as federal judges.
Too many have too much to lose by talking truthfully. Don’t you wonder why Mark Levine will simply not discuss the issue? He is a wealthy man, partly dependent upon party legal business, and dependent upon the FCC, and the IRS, to pay for the education of this two children. At least, while he promotes Rubio and Cruz, neither natural born citizens, has avoided any legal discussion, his shtick - no mention of John Marshall or Hamilton’s praise of Vattel to Washington, or Chief Justice Waite, who wrote Minor, or John Bingham, author of the 14th Amendment. Feet of clay. Read for yourselves, while we still have access to original documents, and most of the corrupted Supreme Court decisions have been restored by the Internet’s most referenced site for historical legal documents,Justia.com, the site whose CEO Tim Stanley is a Soros fellow at Center for American Progress, and whose confederate is Center for American Progess’s CIO, Eric Malamud. For these people the end justifies the means, and the Constitution is often an obstacle.
While I suspect both parties will refuse to address this, since they are both complicit, federal judges are political appointments and the Supreme Court has two Obama appointees who have already refused to recuse themselves, though they have personal and fiduciary interest in any eligibility decision. Nothing is likely to happen. We are a nation of just those laws convenient to the ruling czar. Article’s 1, 2, and 10 are under attack. But Obama swore to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution. His oath was most reflective of Sharia law, where taqia to promulgate the Quran is not just permitted, but ordained.
That's not the reason!
Real Reason: Rush is a self interested coward.
If and when true tyranny comes to our nation, Rush and the other so-called “conservatives” will sell their talents to the fascist oligarchy. They will spit shine the jack boots crushing our necks.
The supposedly conservative media are a close second.
Cowards, one and all. We are @#%#ed
Those Congresscritters were “unseated” by the House. Very different in a Presidential situation. Congress has no “unseating” authority over a legal President other than impeachment.
Congress has the opportunity to object to an elected President when they certify the Electoral College. Speak now or forever hold your peace.
So the presidency is held to a lesser standard. BS.
If only those "congresscritters" had usurped the presidency they'd be OK. /s
Congress has no “unseating” authority over a legal President other than impeachment.
Accept that Oblowme was NEVER LEGALLY president. They have no power to seat an illegal usurper.
Except
BTTT!
Well....Arrest Obama for massive misuse of campaign contributions and fraud. He can be president in prison.
100% correct. Real scans have not halo.
It would be nice if you could turn up a copy of the 1960 manual.
I'm betting it still doesn't say what they claimed the manual said.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.