Sheriff Arpaio's Investigator Mike Zullo Reveals New Devastating Evidence On Obama's Birth Records

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=LUJOSNZpZEU ^

[Cold Case Posse Supporter]

Maricopa County Sheriffs Office Cold Case Posse chief investigator Mike Zullo this morning addressed the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association Convention (CSPOA) being held in St. Charles, Missouri. Much of the information that was revealed by Zullo we have already heard but he also unveiled new evidence that we have not been aware of. Commander Mike Zullo appears in the video at the 36:00 mark. The audio and video from the streaming isn't that good but pay attention very closely.

[Smokeyblue]

http://www.newswithviews.com/Vieira/edwin84.htm

First, if Obama is not “a natural born Citizen” or has renounced such citizenship, he is simply not eligible for “the Office of President” (Article II, Section 1, Clause 4). That being so, he cannot be “elected” by the voters, by the Electoral College, or by the House of Representatives (see Amendment XII). For neither the voters, nor the Electors, nor Members of the House can change the constitutional requirement, even by unanimous vote inter sese (see Article V). If, nonetheless, the voters, the Electors, or the Members of the House purport to “elect” Obama, he will be nothing but an usurper, because the Constitution defines him as such.And he can never become anything else, because an usurper cannot gain legitimacy if even all of the country aid, abets, accedes to, or acquiesces in his usurpation.

SNIP

Edwin Vieira, Jr., holds four degrees from Harvard: A.B. (Harvard College), A.M. and Ph.D. (Harvard Graduate School of Arts and Sciences), and J.D. (Harvard Law School). For more than thirty years he has practiced law, with emphasis on constitutional issues. In the Supreme Court of the United States he successfully argued or briefed the cases leading to the landmark decisions Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, Chicago Teachers Union v. Hudson, and Communications Workers of America v. Beck, which established constitutional and statutory limitations on the uses to which labor unions, in both the private and the public sectors, may apply fees extracted from nonunion workers as a condition of their employment.

[Smokeyblue]

Seventh, if Obama does become an usurper posturing as “the President,” Congress cannot even impeach him because, not being the actual President, he cannot be “removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors” (see Article II, Section 4). In that case, some other public officials would have to arrest him—with physical force, if he would not go along quietly—in order to prevent him from continuing his imposture. Obviously, this could possibly lead to armed conflicts within the General Government itself, or among the States and the people.

http://www.newswithviews.com/Vieira/edwin84.htm

[Jeff Winston]

Yeah, I read it. That’s what prompted my comment.

The only thing on his resume that even HINTS at computer technology is “1994-1995, Computer-Generated Handwriting and Documents.”

None of that has the remotest thing to do with how PDFs are compressed.

[Seizethecarp]

Thanks for the clarification and link!

[Smokeyblue]

I'll go with Edwin Vieira, Jr. over you.

When a Supreme Court judge swears him in he is the LEGAL PRESIDENT.

Wrong

10 Interesting Things You Should Know About Inauguration Day

http://history1900s.about.com/od/fadsfashion/a/inauguration.htm

Although it is not stipulated in the Constitution, it has become a tradition to have the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court be the oath giver to the President on inauguration day. This, surprisingly, is one of the few traditions of inauguration day not begun by George Washington, who had the Chancellor of New York Robert Livingston give him his oath (Washington was sworn in at Federal Hall in New York). John Adams was the first President to have a Chief Justice of the Supreme Court swear him in.

[Ray76]

Understandable.

Also listed are:

• Signature Verification
• Anonymous Letter Evaluation
• Detection of Document Alterations
• Computerized Document Evaluation
• Forgery Investigation
• Restoration of Erasures and Obliterations
• Indented Writing Investigation
• Typewriting Examination

(emphasis added)

http://reedwrite.com/?page_id=133

Investigation need not be limited to "PDF compression"

[GregNH]

Second, if Obama dares to take the Presidential “Oath or Affirmation” of office, knowing that he is not “a natural born Citizen,” he will commit the crime of perjury or false swearing (see Article II, Section 1, Clause 7). For, being ineligible for “the Office of President, he cannot “faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States,” or even execute it at all, to any degree. Thus, his very act of taking the “Oath or Affirmation” will be a violation thereof! So, even if the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court himself looks the other way and administers the “Oath or Affirmation,” Obama will derive no authority whatsoever from it.

And has anyone witnessed the proper taking of the oath of office?

[Jeff Winston]

I’d be interested in seeing the report, if there is one.

Not that I’m expecting anything really new.

[Ladysforest]

The fed codes manual didn’t instruct the punchers on how to code the parents - just the children. By using the parents listed race(s).

The DOH (even at local levels) had to use universal codes for things like race, because the fed coders would reference that if there were any irregularities. In addition to penciling in the codes prior to microfilming, the local DOH would have to catch anomalies - like using “African” as a race. However, the local DOH seemed to have additional info that they were accustomed to harvest for their own use - such as parents business. The fed code manuals don’t touch on that at all.

In the ‘60s they were not all PC as they are now. We know that for a fact. They were trained to fill the forms a certain way for a certain reason. The fed code manual explains what to do if a BC showed up without enough data to make a clear decision on how to code the childs race. It can be expected that the same was true of local level instruction manuals.

[Seizethecarp]

“Why would someone travel to Hawaii to pick up an electronic file?”

To protect the chain of custody of the imaginary “BC” from Onaka’s office to the White House by placing it under Barry’s personal attorney-client privilege. No questions can be asked about the trip the document made.

[Smokeyblue]

I’m not sure.

Remember the first one was wiggy with Traitor John doing it twice. Once in private.

Then there was the hub-bub surrounding the second one falling on a Sunday.

I’d guess that since Traitor John is involved probably not.

[Ladysforest]

Oh, I don’t think there is a problem getting a 1960 manual. I think Dr. Conartist has one.

As to the one used in the long ago presser, well you can thank Dr. Corsi for that cluster. I spoke with Mike about that and a few other things, and I think it confirmed some of Mikes concerns re Dr. Corsi.

I don’t think they work together any more.

What most people are missing is that the manual is not of any value, not the federal one anyway. Not if you are talking about the codes penciled on the BC. Because those were done at the local level.

The feds could not have changed those or anything on the BC - they were working from rolls of microfilm. The fed manual tells them how to handle anomalies - particularly as they might arise coding the childs race. But no changes are made to the actual BC from the federal coders end of the process.

[Usagi_yo]

The gist was, telling me that the documents are forgery is hearsay unless you witnessed the forgery or are an expert. Even then, its hearsay until examined in the proper jurisdiction.

And that’s ALL THE BIRTHER’S offer is hearsay, and then call Congress criminals and traitors because they don’t “look into it” (and I wouldn’t be surprised if as many as 75% had looked into it and decided the issue was a non-starter), and all the Judges are corrupt and in on the conspiracy because they believe they have no jurisdiction. (and they don’t — USCON Article 2 section 4)

As for your reply:

I was putting into simple terms what I found at law.cornell.edu.

[Ray76]

When judges cite Miracle on 34th Street that’s a ten thousand gigawatt flashing red light that something is very wrong.

[edge919]

“If the racial entry is “C,” “Col.,” “Black,” “Brown,” or ”A.A.,” “Afro-American,” and the birthplace is the United States, consider the parent’s race as Negro. If birthplace of parent is not in the United States, code as other nonwhite.”

Which is odd, because the race codes would otherwise jibe with racial classifications in the Census, and the census makes reference to foreign-born negroes. IOW, there's no reason to classify anyone as Negro because of birth outside the United States. There's nothing to indicate such classifications on other known documents before OR after this "revised" coding manual.

[butterdezillion]

Is it hearsay when Alvin Onaka, upon being asked to verify that the White House image is a “true and accurate representation of the original record on file”, refuses to verify that even though required by law to verify whatever is submitted to him for verification if he can?

[X-spurt]

Quit trying to evade your Grade School assertion.

It makes no difference if the SCOTUS or his Aunt Sally gives the President the Oath of Office the effect is the same, the person giving the oath is the legal President. Anything preventative must be done prior to that oath.

Don’t misunderstand, I wish there was some magic wane we could wave and this asshole would disappear, but there isn’t any and we, as America loving patriots are obligated to operate in Realville.

[Smokeyblue]

So you completely ignored three posts by Edwin Viera in neon red but comment only about the stupid oath post?

Oh please. Can’t dispute Viera can you?

[Smokeyblue]

Edwin Vieira, Jr., holds four degrees from Harvard: A.B. (Harvard College), A.M. and Ph.D. (Harvard Graduate School of Arts and Sciences), and J.D. (Harvard Law School).

What are your qualifications?

[butterdezillion]

Addition to that last post: Alvin Onaka is the custodian of the record in question, and the HDOH Administrative Rules give him the authority to determine when a record is disqualified from having certified copies issued, etc. If there is a problem with a vital record it is his expressed job to make sure that it is NOT passed off to the public as if it was fine.

IOW, he is the only “expert” in Hawaii who can lawfully verify anything from Obama’s BC - and he would not verify any of the submitted birth facts or the genuineness of the White House image.

Who could anybody present as a more legally authoritative “expert” than that? The AL Democratic Party presented Onaka as the final authority and probably didn’t like it much when Zullo countered their amicus brief with his own amicus brief pointing out that the expert they referenced actually refused to verify the genuineness of the White House image... Their very own witness actually contradicted what they were trying to claim...