Posted on 03/07/2013 6:39:12 PM PST by Nachum
The UN Human Rights Council released an advanced version of its report on Operation Pillar of Defense.
The report appears to be remarkably fair, especially for the notoriously anti-Israel UN Human Rights Council. When it discusses Gaza civilians that died, it is willing to entertain the possibility that there was a legitimate target in the area for most cases, something we had not seen before. It properly places caveats around its findings of alleged violations by Israel of international law:
In some cases, more information would be required to make a more specific assessment. Based on the information available to OHCHR, the IDF did not consistently uphold the basic principles of conduct of hostilities, namely, the principles of distinction, proportionality and precautions. Further, the effectiveness, sufficiency and adequacy of precautions taken remains questionable in several cases.
No such doubt exists for Hamas' violations:
(Excerpt) Read more at elderofziyon.blogspot.com ...
The name of son of the BBC reporter’s first name was Jihad? I guess I don’t have to wonder what side he was favoring. He got a nasty little surprise. And some innocent people were killed by his friends as well.
Anti-Israel reporting and omissions are bad enough here in the States—far worse in the UK.
Based on the information available to OHCHR, the IDF did not consistently uphold the basic principles of conduct of hostilities, namely, the principles of distinction, proportionality and precautions. Further, the effectiveness, sufficiency and adequacy of precautions taken remains questionable in several cases. No such doubt exists for Hamas' violationsI boldfaced the buried lead.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.