Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Nero Germanicus

This judge and Supreme Court in Washington refused to do anything that their state law required in response to Linda Jordan’s affidavit, because they claimed that multiple court cases had ruled that eligibility can only be considered by CONGRESS. It is not justiciable at the state level, they claim.

That’s why a bunch of us are saying these rulings stink.


408 posted on 02/05/2013 8:39:14 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 406 | View Replies ]


To: butterdezillion

My comment was about 2012 BALLOT CHALLENGES to Obama’s eligibility that were heard and ruled on 50 times in 22 states.
The first reason that the original jurisdiction trial judge in Washington gave for dismissing the lawsuit of Ms. Jordan was that his reading of Washington law was that Barack Obama must be named as a defendant as an “indispensable party” and he wasn’t named.


409 posted on 02/06/2013 1:05:11 AM PST by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 408 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson