My comment was about 2012 BALLOT CHALLENGES to Obama’s eligibility that were heard and ruled on 50 times in 22 states.
The first reason that the original jurisdiction trial judge in Washington gave for dismissing the lawsuit of Ms. Jordan was that his reading of Washington law was that Barack Obama must be named as a defendant as an “indispensable party” and he wasn’t named.
The statute says straight-out that the JUDGE must order the person accused in the affidavit to right the wrong. That places the burden of responsibility on the JUDGE.
All the public is supposed to do is report the crime, and then the system itself is supposed to make sure that the problem is fixed. Instead, the system made sure the person who reported it was punished (and a former WA Supreme Court justice agrees with me that the fine she received was punitive and just plain wrong).
And why did the challenge fail in Georgia (where Malihi ordered both Obama and his lawyer to appear because they had the burden to prove that Obama is eligible, but they didn’t even show up and yet the judge called Obama eligible and refused to certify the proceedings so contempt of court charges could be filed)?
Why did it fail in Florida, where the judge said Obama’s acted like President for 4 years so evidence shouldn’t matter any more?
Stuff like this is why it is apparent to a bunch of us that the judiciary is rigged. You said it yourself, that there were 22 states where ballot challenges were ruled on 50 times - and yet Obama has NEVER had to present even the same documentation that my sons had to present in order to detassel corn, even though there is a criminal investigation in process for forgery and fraud involving Obama’s claimed birth certificate and the HI registrar has confirmed that the White House image is a forgery and the real BC in their files is legally non-valid.
What are the odds that somebody who is known to have presented in public a forged document that law enforcement is trying to track down who created it, AND whose genuine BC is known to be non-valid ... would be ruled eligible to be on the ballot FIFTY TIMES without showing even what is required for a detasseler? 50/50, the courts have gotten wrong on these challenges - certifiably wrong, because the HI registrar has confirmed that there are no legally-established birth facts for Obama from Hawaii records.
What are the odds that courts all over the country would certifiably get 50/50 cases wrong, if there was not some other factor at work?