“302 people with last names starting with W, X, Y, and Z.”
Not if they were divided into geographic regions you would have 302 people some from the other Honolulu County region and others from other islands. In those cases the the letter could be anything from A-Z.
“If I remember correctly, Corsi did not “find” Johanna Ah Nee’s BC; she offered it to him.”
She has twice requested its return — probably through her friend who asked her if she would loan it — but Mr. Corsi has not returned the certificate.
WND could offer a bounty for August 1961 BCs. IIRC, some of the parents listed in the newspaper announcements are still owners of the houses from 1961.
“Monika Waidelich”
I put her statements in the same category as I put Abercrombie, Mrs. Nordyke, Stanley Ann’s Washington friends. They are interesting but it is impossible to evaluate them as anything than waht they are memories from 40-50 years ago of an event that probable was that memorable to begin with. How much have their stories been influenced by what they read in the news before a reporter showed up at their house. I’m sure their is a certain amount of exaggeration and false memories.
As to Ms. Lee while I agree that she would remember the system she used everyday, is she conflating different systems. In 1961 she would have been 45, 46. Did she work at the DOH until she retired at 65? Is she remembering how things were done in 1961 or 1971 or 1981. Did the system change overtime? If you showed her Axxxx’s BC and cert number and the Nordyes’ and Obama’s and Waidelich’s, would she go “oh yeah we did alphabetize them.”?
“Do you acknowledge that the HDOH has been caught”
Are you telling me some computer programmer misunderstood something and wrote code that encluded BCs that shouldn’t have been there?
The numbers I gave already accounted for the geographical division. That’s why I said there would be that many HONOLULU births before and after Waidelich’s number.
So Dr. Con does have an “in” with Johanna Ah Nee.
The reason to have the stuff sorted geographically was because the CDC penalized states if too many of their BC’s on the tapes that were sent in were from a different geographic area. They set the geographic location to fill in automatically because the tapes were supposed to have the births in groups by geographic area, and if they had too many that were sprinkled in from other places they had to go to the extra trouble of overriding the automatic setting. So it doesn’t seem like there would be much reason for the system to change over time.
And if the eyewitnesses can’t even remember how they did it then it is ESPECIALLY imperative that we look at the actual microfilms, because that’s the only place we’re going to get answers.
There would have been no need to forge Virginia Sunahara’s death certificate unless something on it was changed. Why would they have to change the information on a dead baby girl’s 50-year-old death certificate? And to put such glaring signs of forgery (Territory of Hawaii reference on a State of Hawaii death certificate and, mismatched, misaligned fonts - all on the same row as a handwritten, anomalous BC#).
I am not saying that any computer person “mistakenly” changed code. Somebody deliberately put into the 1960-64 birth index individual names that were from nonvalid records. Another adopted person did NOT have her birth name in the index, so it wasn’t that they accidentally set the printing to include all BC’s including non-valid, legally sealed records. Individual names were specifically manipulated to be put into that index. Norman and Nathan Asing were 2 of those names, and what Onaka revealed to Ken Bennett indirectly confirms that Obama’s name was another.
Do you acknowledge that the 1960-64 birth index includes legally non-valid records?