Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: 4Zoltan

The numbers I gave already accounted for the geographical division. That’s why I said there would be that many HONOLULU births before and after Waidelich’s number.

So Dr. Con does have an “in” with Johanna Ah Nee.

The reason to have the stuff sorted geographically was because the CDC penalized states if too many of their BC’s on the tapes that were sent in were from a different geographic area. They set the geographic location to fill in automatically because the tapes were supposed to have the births in groups by geographic area, and if they had too many that were sprinkled in from other places they had to go to the extra trouble of overriding the automatic setting. So it doesn’t seem like there would be much reason for the system to change over time.

And if the eyewitnesses can’t even remember how they did it then it is ESPECIALLY imperative that we look at the actual microfilms, because that’s the only place we’re going to get answers.

There would have been no need to forge Virginia Sunahara’s death certificate unless something on it was changed. Why would they have to change the information on a dead baby girl’s 50-year-old death certificate? And to put such glaring signs of forgery (Territory of Hawaii reference on a State of Hawaii death certificate and, mismatched, misaligned fonts - all on the same row as a handwritten, anomalous BC#).

I am not saying that any computer person “mistakenly” changed code. Somebody deliberately put into the 1960-64 birth index individual names that were from nonvalid records. Another adopted person did NOT have her birth name in the index, so it wasn’t that they accidentally set the printing to include all BC’s including non-valid, legally sealed records. Individual names were specifically manipulated to be put into that index. Norman and Nathan Asing were 2 of those names, and what Onaka revealed to Ken Bennett indirectly confirms that Obama’s name was another.

Do you acknowledge that the 1960-64 birth index includes legally non-valid records?


135 posted on 01/24/2013 5:26:36 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]


To: 4Zoltan; LucyT; null and void

Lucy and Nully, can you ping the lists on this one? I’ve been so busy with other stuff that I haven’t gone into the Sunahara death certificate forgery much, but it corroborates my belief that somebody at the HDOH is putting red flags in the forgeries that Fuddy is forcing them to create - including Obama’s HDOH-fabricated BC at the request of law enforcement (Eric Holder?).

I meant to say that somebody at the HDOH putting such glaring signs of forgery on Virginia Sunahara’s death certificate strongly suggests that somebody at the HDOH is resisting what they are being forced to do. It would have been no sweat to just leave everything the same except the handwritten number when the forgery was done. To put in the misaligned, mismatched fonts and the T. H. (standing for Territory of Hawaii) took extra effort. Why go to that extra effort to put in blatant signs of forgery, unless it was intended to be a red flag?

A lot of us wondered why Obama’s long-form forgery was so badly done. Well, in the case of Virginia’s death certificate we know that the forgery itself came from somebody at the HDOH who went to extra trouble to put in red flags during the course of the forgery. Apparently they were forced to do the forgery (Loretta Fuddy would be the one capable of forcing somebody to do something like that) and they resisted by putting in red flags.

I believe the same thing happened with Obama’s long-form. Somebody resisted by putting in red flags, and that’s why the Obama people couldn’t just scan or photograph what the HDOH gave them, even though the “information contained in” the image they ended up creating “matched” the “information contained in” what the HDOH gave them.

IOW, somebody put in signs of the document’s non-validity: LATE and/or ALTERED stamps, and possibly a notation in the final box as well - noting what evidence was offered for a late or altered filing. That box could be empty though, if no evidence was offered (which seems characteristic of Obama and his people...) Depends on how Onaka interpreted the word “information” - whether it only meant the information in the boxes, or whether it also included things like LATE and ALTERED stamps.

Whoever stamped the document with LATE and ALTERED presumably did it after Fuddy observed the copies being made, and they presumably also used the stamp with TXE and added the smiley face to Onaka’s signature - more red flags, which the Obama people apparently missed, in their rush to get rid of the LATE and ALTERED stamps and come up with something for the press conference that looked like it was certified.


138 posted on 01/24/2013 7:01:24 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson