well duh, of course not, you can't terrorize a building!!! wait...Only Timothy McVeigh types can be terrorists.
TRANSLATION: One of 0bama's muzzie bros just doin' what ragheads do!
So charge him with the crime of Jihad.
Can’t be having no terrorist attack on obama’s watch, now can we?
Of course not. He was probably just justifiably upset over a horrible anti-Islam video on Youtube. I think it's time for Obama to reiterate his apologies for allowing such a video to be created in this bad, bad country.
Yes, to prosecute them would offend Muslims.
lemme guess....he will be charged with Possession of a Device Not in Compliance With Consumer Product Safety Commission Regulations”?
This is the New Progressive America where DC actually sponsors and supports Islamic Terrorist attacks throughout the Middle East (Syria) and North Africa (Libya). So how in the world could they call the same Islamic extremist they are are employing in the Middle East and North Africa, terrorists ?
See the precedent that Ft. Hood set? If that can’t be called terrorism, how could this possibly be?/sarc. Effing no good rotten political sensibilties be damned. This is jihad, plain and simple.
>>FBI will not prosecute bombing of government building bombing with IED as terrorism due to “political sensitivities”>>
I’m furious.
The CIA investigates and the FBI sues. They got Petraeus out as head of the CIA, and now have taken over the FBI.
I wonder if illegal voting will be considered as “too sensitive” to arrest the illegal voters.
Sorry, but the FBI does not prosecute anyone. The U.S. Attorneys of the U.S. Department of (In)Justice choose to prosecute or not to prosecute. The FBI are simply a federal police force. Nothing more, nothing less than a bunch of flat-footed doofuses unlike what you see on television shows like “Criminal Minds”.
It’s gonna be a Long, Long, 4 Years!!
Of course not, it calls into question some seriously bad longstanding policies.
Something *may* be wrong with this case. The descriptions of the guy almost seem like two different people.
To start with, some were saying that he was a legitimate refugee who was thrilled with being in the US, did not go to a mosque, and was not an observant Muslim.
However, he did serve a sentence four years ago for aggravated harassment of his former employer, and worked as a day laborer at the SS office. In addition, he is currently facing assault and disorderly conducted charges in a separate case in Casa Grande.
So while he fits the profile of a hothead with anger issues, it might actually *not* be terrorism.
FBI will not prosecute bombing of government building bombing with IED as terrorism due to “political sensitivities”
wtf is it going to take to be a terrorist attack.
well duh, of course not, you can't terrorize a building!!! wait...