That is your personal opinion. This is a legal matter. Only if your legal opinion is affirmed by a judge, state SOS or AG would your opinion become an “actual” legal fact. That has not happened. So far I have not seen even a single lawyer willing to argue in support of your opinion and lawyers will argue any side of any issue if paid enough or motivated for other reasons, but they haven’t embraced your interpretation of what “actually” happened.
What did “actually” happen, IMO (IANAL either) is that Bennett, rightly or wrongly, interpreted the HI “authentication” by Onaka to provide sufficient legal basis to establish a claim to AZ by HI that “legal records” of some kind affirm that Barry was born in HI making Barry eligible as an NBC (under the legal theory that only US soil birth matters) and Bennett honored HI’s claim under the full faith and credit clause of the Constitution.
That’s how Bennett interpreted it even though he had an attorney inform him that by law Onaka’s verification must be legally presumed to confirm that Obama’s birth facts CANNOT be verified.
IOW, Bennett chose to ignore what the attorney told him so that he could misinterpret Onaka’s disclosure to mean exactly the opposite of what it legally means.