Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Seizethecarp

That’s how Bennett interpreted it even though he had an attorney inform him that by law Onaka’s verification must be legally presumed to confirm that Obama’s birth facts CANNOT be verified.

IOW, Bennett chose to ignore what the attorney told him so that he could misinterpret Onaka’s disclosure to mean exactly the opposite of what it legally means.


83 posted on 12/03/2012 11:26:09 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: butterdezillion

Maybe Bennett got some glossy photos in the mail ..... and had a sudden change of heart.


84 posted on 12/03/2012 1:13:38 PM PST by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

To: butterdezillion
Attorneys have lots of opinions. That's why we have judges and juries! A letter from one lawyer won't influence Bennett much.

Bennett is an accountant by training, but doubtless had a staff of top lawyers advising him, especially ones on loan from the Romney campaign advising him on how a federal judge or jury would interpret the HI “authentication.” I expect that they told Bennett he would get the same ruling as Judge Carter predicted he would give in dicta which is if HI authorities say Barry was born in HI, then even if Kenya were to certify Barry's birth there Judge Carter would rule that it is still established as a legal fact that he was born in HI until proved otherwise in HI.

91 posted on 12/03/2012 7:12:16 PM PST by Seizethecarp (Defend aircraft from "runway kill zone" mini-drone helicopter swarm attacks: www.runwaykillzone.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson