Skip to comments.
Should FreeRepublic be closed to anyone w/o an account on election day/night?
11-5-12
| Arcy
Posted on 11/05/2012 5:55:58 AM PST by Arcy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-99 next last
To: Arcy
Let em come.
Win or lose we'll kick their ass.
21
posted on
11/05/2012 6:07:12 AM PST
by
skeeter
To: Arcy
It would also be adventageous to prevent the creation of new accounts on FR (starting now) until after the election to keep out the liberals who will certainly come here to explode in anger as elction results come in. New users have their submissions reviewed by moderators prior to them being posted.
To: Arcy; BuckeyeTexan
To accomplish this, you would need to install a complete authentication layer, complete with session-id checking to prevent backdoor access.
So, let us see, we have approximately 36 hours.
Figure, 3 hours on design, 16 hours on coding, 4 hours testing, 4 hours corrections, 3 hours user acceptance testing, 3 hours implementation, 3 hours production testing.
WE HAVE *JUST* ENOUGH TIME! How's your Perl under Linux?
23
posted on
11/05/2012 6:07:36 AM PST
by
Lazamataz
(The Pravda Press has gone from 'biased' straight on through to 'utterly bizarre'.)
To: Arcy
I do not think it would be a good idea even though I am a monthly donor. Writing that, I think I probably will not be able to reach FR due to overload and have to get my updates elsewhere.
I really wish we could get the problems fixed. FR is most important during these times. I am quite addicted to FR and would like to see easy access, especially during these times.
To: Arcy
I think FR should implement an emergency wartime footing stance, if nothing else it will be a trial runm to see if it keeps FR up and running.
Allow only a dozen or so threads al election themed, nothing else all day long, all election thtreeads will only last two hours our a set amount of replies, any multiple reply posters will immediately have to wait no less than 30 minutes before they can post again, if the continue to make duplicate posts the are zotted.
seriously this is important, we need to get serious because playing fair and nice doesn’t always win the game.
25
posted on
11/05/2012 6:08:08 AM PST
by
Eye of Unk
(President Romney, get used to it.)
To: mmichaels1970
so, you’re saying that upgrading screwed things up?
26
posted on
11/05/2012 6:08:22 AM PST
by
nuconvert
( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
To: onyx
I’ve hosted websites before, both on my own servers and with hosting companys. The TEMPORARY election night changes I’m suggesting are VERY EASY to employ. It can be done in less than 5-minutes!
27
posted on
11/05/2012 6:08:42 AM PST
by
Arcy
(When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice; But when a wicked man rules, people groan.)
To: Admin Moderator; BuckeyeTexan
Yeah, but see my message just below yours. I mean, it's PERFECTLY reasonable to install a complete and tested Authentication model in 36 hours, right?
And to do it a day before the election -- BRILLIANT!!!!
What could POSSIBLY go wrong??!?
28
posted on
11/05/2012 6:09:29 AM PST
by
Lazamataz
(The Pravda Press has gone from 'biased' straight on through to 'utterly bizarre'.)
To: Arcy
Could it technically be done?
29
posted on
11/05/2012 6:09:47 AM PST
by
SWAMPSNIPER
(The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
To: Arcy
“I’ve noticed in elections past that DU does not allow access to even VIEW their site during elections unless you have an account. We should do the same!”
Why? Why imitate the losers at DU?
I like the idea of keeping page-load times down, but otherwise, this seems like a bad idea. It indicates a lack of confidence. If Romney is winning—especially big—why would FR need the “protection”?
30
posted on
11/05/2012 6:09:59 AM PST
by
nkronos
To: Arcy
31
posted on
11/05/2012 6:10:11 AM PST
by
Safrguns
To: real saxophonist
32
posted on
11/05/2012 6:10:25 AM PST
by
Founding Father
(The Pedophile moHAMmudd (PBUH---Pigblood be upon him))
To: Arcy
Well, we know it'll be a very busy day and evening, so for bandwadth and system sake, maybe so, and that'd be JimRob & Assoc call.
But it seems like censorship to me, which is more DU's province. I'd vote no.
33
posted on
11/05/2012 6:10:58 AM PST
by
theDentist
(FUBO; qwerty ergo typo : i type, therefore i misspelll)
To: Admin Moderator
You need to understand that server resources responding to new account creation is taking bandwidth that could be used for current members!
34
posted on
11/05/2012 6:11:05 AM PST
by
Arcy
(When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice; But when a wicked man rules, people groan.)
To: Arcy
Well, there’s your solution!
Start your own website!
35
posted on
11/05/2012 6:12:46 AM PST
by
onyx
(FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY! IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
To: Lazamataz
I’ve done it before on sites that I’ve hosted and it’s nowhere near the complicated process you’ve outlined. I can do it in 5-minutes flat!
36
posted on
11/05/2012 6:12:46 AM PST
by
Arcy
(When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice; But when a wicked man rules, people groan.)
To: Arcy; BuckeyeTexan
Ive hosted websites before, both on my own servers and with hosting companys. The TEMPORARY election night changes Im suggesting are VERY EASY to employ. It can be done in less than 5-minutes!Alllllright sparky. You are on.
I design and maintain websites for a living. Federal ones. Done commercial for decades, as well.
Explain to me, in detail, just what you propose to do at the authentication level, that can be done 'in five minutes'....Let us assume no authorisation concerns. Admin Mod and JimRob will not be in issue as part of your model. I'm willing to cut that slack, just to hear this 'five minute fix'..... :)
(this I gotta hear)
37
posted on
11/05/2012 6:13:58 AM PST
by
Lazamataz
(The Pravda Press has gone from 'biased' straight on through to 'utterly bizarre'.)
To: Arcy
Should FreeRepublic be closed to anyone w/o an account on election day/night?
That won't matter. FR will chug down to a crawl by tomorrow afternoon and stall out by 7pm ET.
FR has been sputtering since Hillary Clinton gave her concession speech in the 2008 Dem primary.
Two early telethons raised money for new equipment. That fund still has money, so 'equipment' doesn't seem to be the problem. That would seem to leave program software or Internet backbone.
FR has had serious stalling problems since the primary debates.
Best best -- bookmark some of the alternative sites.
38
posted on
11/05/2012 6:14:06 AM PST
by
TomGuy
To: nuconvert
so, youre saying that upgrading screwed things up?
No. I'm just saying in the IT world that upgrading USUALLY screws things up. I have no idea about FR's software or backbone.
Post was more of a dig at myself..whenever I fix something, I tend break ten other things. I don't feel so bad though, Microsoft does the same thing with every OS release.
To: real saxophonist
40
posted on
11/05/2012 6:14:53 AM PST
by
JPG
(Make it happen)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-99 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson