For Obama, A Scapegoat in hand is worth more than another round of Bush Blaming

Michelle Obama's Mirror ^ | 10-1-2012 | MOTUS

[NOBO2012]

Breitbart is currently running a story in which Joel Pollack claims that Romney is currently filling the role of a “scape-president:”

In effect, "President" Romney has been in office since mid-August, with none of the power but all of the responsibility.

Which is really nothing other than proof of it's corollary:

In effect, “President” Obama has been in office since January 2009, with all of the power butt none of the responsibility.

Sometimes a good scapegoat is better than your bad solution.

This is a brilliant strategy from Big Guy’s Big Brains. Here’s a partial list (so far) of things the real incumbent is not responsible for, on account of it was all Bush’s fault...

The Economy; including:... The deficit; including:... Fast and Furious Solyndra, et al Any and all wars, including the new ones Revitamization of al Qaeda (see video below) Benghazigate And, according to the rule of corollaries, if you’re not responsible, that means that your scapegoat IS. And now that the Republicans have an official presidential candidate, the torch has been passed.

Fade to the right…

So it looks like we’ve got everything back on track to WTF (“Win The Future,” in case you forgot). And just in time, because...

So the only thing we know at this point is whoever wins this election is going to inherit the biggest mess in history. Which is good for Big Guy because he likes to have something to blame stuff on.

Chill, dude, I’ve got this thing in the bag.

[Bitsy]

Oh, my, don't tell me they have beat the last strand out of the Bush rug! That's a milestone in the demoncratic party. Naw, they must be spreading the blame around a little.