Posted on 08/19/2012 6:25:21 PM PDT by Kaslin
After some of the recent Obama-loving/Romney-bashing Newsweek covers, the one hitting newsstands Monday is guaranteed to turn some heads.
Under the picture of our dear leader are the words, "Hit the Road, Barack: Why We Need a New Leader."
The article is written by Niall Ferguson, a British historian and economist that backed John McCain in 2008.
After an introduction, Ferguson made his case:
In his inaugural address, Obama promised not only to create new jobs, but to lay a new foundation for growth. He promised to build the roads and bridges, the electric grids, and digital lines that feed our commerce and bind us together. He promised to restore science to its rightful place and wield technologys wonders to raise health cares quality and lower its cost. And he promised to transform our schools and colleges and universities to meet the demands of a new age. Unfortunately the presidents scorecard on every single one of those bold pledges is pitiful.
He continued:
[T]he total number of private-sector jobs is still 4.3 million below the January 2008 peak. Meanwhile, since 2008, a staggering 3.6 million Americans have been added to Social Securitys disability insurance program. This is one of many ways unemployment is being concealed.In his fiscal year 2010 budgetthe first he presentedthe president envisaged growth of 3.2 percent in 2010, 4.0 percent in 2011, 4.6 percent in 2012. The actual numbers were 2.4 percent in 2010 and 1.8 percent in 2011; few forecasters now expect it to be much above 2.3 percent this year.
Unemployment was supposed to be 6 percent by now. It has averaged 8.2 percent this year so far. Meanwhile real median annual household income has dropped more than 5 percent since June 2009. Nearly 110 million individuals received a welfare benefit in 2011, mostly Medicaid or food stamps.
Welcome to Obamas America: nearly half the population is not represented on a taxable returnalmost exactly the same proportion that lives in a household where at least one member receives some type of government benefit. We are becoming the 5050 nationhalf of us paying the taxes, the other half receiving the benefits.
And all this despite a far bigger hike in the federal debt than we were promised. According to the 2010 budget, the debt in public hands was supposed to fall in relation to GDP from 67 percent in 2010 to less than 66 percent this year. If only. By the end of this year, according to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), it will reach 70 percent of GDP. These figures significantly understate the debt problem, however. The ratio that matters is debt to revenue. That number has leapt upward from 165 percent in 2008 to 262 percent this year, according to figures from the International Monetary Fund. Among developed economies, only Ireland and Spain have seen a bigger deterioration.
Ferguson also took aim at the media's coverage of Obama:
Yet the public mistakes his administrations astonishingly uninhibited use of political assassination for a coherent strategy. According to the Bureau of Investigative Journalism in London, the civilian proportion of drone casualties was 16 percent last year. Ask yourself how the liberal media would have behaved if George W. Bush had used drones this way. Yet somehow it is only ever Republican secretaries of state who are accused of committing war crimes.
Indeed. As we've seen in the past three and a half years, Obama can do virtually anything he wants and his media will either applaud or look the other away.
That said, after spending the bulk of his lengthy piece chronicling the current White House resident's missteps, Ferguson spoke glowingly about Paul Ryan:
He is one of only a handful of politicians in Washington who is truly sincere about addressing this countrys fiscal crisis....But one thing is clear. Ryan psychs Obama out. This has been apparent ever since the White House went on the offensive against Ryan in the spring of last year. And the reason he psychs him out is that, unlike Obama, Ryan has a planas opposed to a narrativefor this country. [...]The voters now face a stark choice. They can let Barack Obamas rambling, solipsistic narrative continue until they find themselves living in some American version of Europe, with low growth, high unemployment, even higher debtand real geopolitical decline.
Or they can opt for real change: the kind of change that will end four years of economic underperformance, stop the terrifying accumulation of debt, and reestablish a secure fiscal foundation for American national security.
And this is actually Newsweek's cover story this week making one ask a simple question: Why?
Since Tina Brown's Daily Beast took over the failing magazine, it has been one of the most left-leaning publications in the country.
So why with less than three months to go before Election Day would they publish a 3,200-word cover story severely criticizing Obama whilst basically endorsing his opponent?
Could it be the Daily Beast/Newsweek combination has not been attracting the kind of readership they expected, and they believe a little objectivity was in order?
Or is this just a tiny dose of conservatism before a deluge of the most biased Obama-loving/Romney-bashing imaginable?
As the late Ed Hart used to say, we will know in the fullness of time.
Newsweak hedging their pathetic bet.
F**k ‘em. WAY too late.
Deathbed conversion for the Obama Regime butt kissing Newsweek.
Problem: who the heck reads Newsweek anymore?
Still, it is worth looking at the website to read all the leftist scums head exploding.
is this just a tiny dose of conservatism before a deluge of the most biased Obama-loving/Romney-bashing imaginable
Apparently the leeches don’t have the bling to buy newspeak anymore.
Now that is funny.
a little too late. Screw you Newsweek! Hope you go down in flames. I’ve already read the article and don’t need to spend good money on this pathetic fish wrap.
Is the writer a US citizen?
When and if you lose the mainstream media, you’re toast!
When and if you lose the mainstream media, you’re toast!
When and if you lose the mainstream media, you’re toast!
Newsweek has already announced they’re going digital only. This is their last hurrah to sell magazines like in their glory days. Most people will see this issue and think its a late April Fools edition.
At least the pop-culture public might see it as they pass in the cashier check-out lines. They don’t need to read the article. The title is enough.
gosh we need to go buy a copy!
gosh we need to go buy a copy!
No, he is a British historian and economist
Man, I was SHOCKED to find out that was real.
First he is “god”. Then, he is “gay”. Now he is a Loser (no scare quotes needed).
He better watch out, next month some mag might darken him up, a la O.J. Simpson.
I hate Obama with a passionate passion, because he is an America-hating, closet commie of the very worst kind.
But....the MSM is worse. They are just sniveling hyenas and I will be pleased as punch to watch them all fall down. I think that will happen in my lifetime.
Hey, NY Times, I’ve got a bottle of really cheap champagne in my fridge. I think I’ll save it for the day you stop publishing your daily NY Paper. And then I will drink it with glee.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.