Finny, Romney is not “hard left”.... lol
Although I really don’t know what you consider “hard”
Mathematically if you choose to be a “zero” for candidate you are voting against them, in a race of two people. If you refuse to vote for either one - that is the same as voting for both of them.
So you can vote for Obama if you want - but you’d probably be more comfortable posting on DU.
>>Mathematically if you choose to be a “zero” for candidate you are voting against them, in a race of two people. If you refuse to vote for either one - that is the same as voting for both of them.
<<
yes and no — by not adding a potential vote to one candidate, it adds a vote to the other.
It is like basketball. Posessions don’t move in groups of 2 points, they move in groups of 4 — the 2 you should have gotten and the 2 they got.
1. I consider "hard left" having the government taking complete control of health care with regard to employers, employees, individuals, families, and the medical industry and imposing mandates on free people. What Romney did in Massachusetts, remember?
2. I consider "hard left" forcing every entity, at the risk of heavy punishment, from adoption agencies to the military, from public schools to the Boy Scouts, to accommodate homosexuals and the homosexual lifestyle. Pretty much what Romney did in Massachusettes, remember?
3. I consider "hard left" the embrace of the global warming agenda and the idea that "any carbon plan has to be worldwide in stop -- let's have a worldwide solution, not an American one" (Mitt Romney, CPAC speech, 2008).
4. I consider "hard left" the idea that abortion should be available on demand and subsidizied by taxpayers to any woman 18 or older and if a minor girl wants an abortion but her parents object, that she should be able to go to a judge and have him override her parents' wishes. (Mitt Romney, again).
5. I consider "hard left" appointing activist judges (look at Romney's record).
What do you consider "hard"? Or more to the point, what do you consider "conservative" in Romney's RECORD?
Mathematically if you choose to be a “zero” for candidate you are voting against them, in a race of two people. If you refuse to vote for either one - that is the same as voting for both of them.
False, mathematically and logically. Sorry, FRiend. There is only one way that you can vote for a candidate, and that is to mark his name on your ballot, emotional "mathematics" to the contrary. As for voting for "both of them" if you don't vote at all ...
... that's just pathetic.